20th Workshop on Principles of Advanced and Distributed Simulation (PADS'06)
DOI: 10.1109/pads.2006.11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aurora: An Approach to High Throughput Parallel Simulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The advantages of such approach over conventional PDES include support for execution over heterogeneous distributed computing platforms, load balancing, efficient execution on shared platforms, easy addition or removal of client machines during execution, simpler fault tolerance, and improved portability. The Aurora Parallel and Distributed Simulation System (Aurora) [135] is a prototype implementation of the master/worker paradigm. Several extensions and improvements to Aurora were presented later on including a scalable version for parallel discrete event simulations on desktop girds [136], an optimistic time management compliant for publicresource computing infrastructures and desktop grids [137], and a version implemented for metacomputing systems [138].…”
Section: Parallel and Distributed Environmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The advantages of such approach over conventional PDES include support for execution over heterogeneous distributed computing platforms, load balancing, efficient execution on shared platforms, easy addition or removal of client machines during execution, simpler fault tolerance, and improved portability. The Aurora Parallel and Distributed Simulation System (Aurora) [135] is a prototype implementation of the master/worker paradigm. Several extensions and improvements to Aurora were presented later on including a scalable version for parallel discrete event simulations on desktop girds [136], an optimistic time management compliant for publicresource computing infrastructures and desktop grids [137], and a version implemented for metacomputing systems [138].…”
Section: Parallel and Distributed Environmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MW paradigm offers several important advantages over traditional PDES implementations such as transparent fault tolerance, support for dynamic load balancing, and execution on shared resources [3]. The MW paradigm provides automated system level support for many tasks, greatly simplifying exploitation of parallel execution by PDES users.…”
Section: Background and Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous work on the Aurora system has focused on providing a middleware system that is portable across varying platforms through web services [3] and accommodating multiple simultaneous large scale PDES applications using conservative synchronization [4]. The work presented in this paper describes the issues raised and possible solution approaches in applying the MW computing paradigm for optimistic time management.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that if the federation has components that cross firewalls, only the pull model can be used; network callbacks are rarely allowed through firewalls. At Georgia Tech, the IDSim project has recently morphed into a prototype system called Aurora [11], which is focused on running large distributed simulations in a grid computing environment.…”
Section: Idsimmentioning
confidence: 99%