2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00405-021-06903-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Auricular reconstruction: where are we now? A critical literature review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI) provides optimal outcomes in patients with lesions greater than 3–4 cm 2 without involvement of subchondral bone (Bentley et al 2003 ; Brittberg et al 1994 ; Dekker et al 2021 ; Mastbergen et al 2013 ; Niemeyer et al 2016 ). Although this surgical treatment is effective for many patients, current research for ACI improvement is focused on using stem cells and 3D printing (Humphries et al 2022 ). Unfortunately this technology is currently only available for use in experimental ACI models (Liao et al 2019 ; Zopf et al 2018 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI) provides optimal outcomes in patients with lesions greater than 3–4 cm 2 without involvement of subchondral bone (Bentley et al 2003 ; Brittberg et al 1994 ; Dekker et al 2021 ; Mastbergen et al 2013 ; Niemeyer et al 2016 ). Although this surgical treatment is effective for many patients, current research for ACI improvement is focused on using stem cells and 3D printing (Humphries et al 2022 ). Unfortunately this technology is currently only available for use in experimental ACI models (Liao et al 2019 ; Zopf et al 2018 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reconstruction of the auricle is a necessary procedure for patients with afflictions ranging from congenital microtia to acquired auricular defects caused by burns, trauma, and oncologic resection (Storck et al., 2014). The most common methods for reconstruction of the ear utilize autologous costal cartilage grafts or MEDPOR implants to fabricate the auricular scaffold (Humphries et al., 2021). Autologous approaches require harvest of several costal cartilage segments to reconstruct the pinna in a multi‐stage procedure that requires a high level of surgical expertise and in all but the most experienced hands results in variable esthetic outcomes (Yamada, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The core components required to generate a tissue‐engineered auricle are a scaffold, cellular components, and an environment that promotes cell survival and proliferation (Humphries et al., 2021). Ideal scaffolds can be designed with computer‐aided manufacturing using a biocompatible material to make patient‐specific designs based upon their contralateral normal ear.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Auricular reconstruction for microtia generally relies on either the gold standard of the autologous rib cartilage technique or auricular prostheses implantation in the clinic. 1 3 Innate limitations, including donor-site morbidity and extrusion or rejection for long-term implantation, have stimulated us to develop alternative strategies for cartilage regeneration. Cartilage tissue engineering provides a promising pathway to overcome the aforementioned limitations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Auricular reconstruction for microtia generally relies on either the gold standard of the autologous rib cartilage technique or auricular prostheses implantation in the clinic. Innate limitations, including donor-site morbidity and extrusion or rejection for long-term implantation, have stimulated us to develop alternative strategies for cartilage regeneration. Cartilage tissue engineering provides a promising pathway to overcome the aforementioned limitations. In the case of cartilage regeneration, various biomaterials, including collagen, gelatin, silk, hyaluronic acid, poly- l -lactic acid (PLLA), polyglycolic acid, poly­(lactic acid- co -glycolic acid), and polycaprolactone, have been employed to construct tissue-engineering scaffolds, which provide similar microenvironments to mimic the intrinsic extracellular matrix (ECM). ,, In addition, mechanical features and porous or channeled structures have significant influence on cell adhesion, proliferation, migration, and differentiation. Generally, physical composite techniques or 3D printing is used to prepare polymeric scaffolds with desired physicochemical features to achieve cell seeding and subsequent tissue regeneration. ,, Previously, in our group, we prepared silk fiber-based composite scaffolds by integrating natural macromolecules [gelatin, silk fibroin, and Antheraea pernyi (Ap) silk fiber] with PLLA porous microspheres (PMs) stimulated by a “steel bar reinforced concrete” structure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%