“…Auricular reconstruction for microtia generally relies on either the gold standard of the autologous rib cartilage technique or auricular prostheses implantation in the clinic. − Innate limitations, including donor-site morbidity and extrusion or rejection for long-term implantation, have stimulated us to develop alternative strategies for cartilage regeneration. Cartilage tissue engineering provides a promising pathway to overcome the aforementioned limitations. − In the case of cartilage regeneration, various biomaterials, including collagen, gelatin, silk, hyaluronic acid, poly- l -lactic acid (PLLA), polyglycolic acid, poly(lactic acid- co -glycolic acid), and polycaprolactone, have been employed to construct tissue-engineering scaffolds, which provide similar microenvironments to mimic the intrinsic extracellular matrix (ECM). ,, In addition, mechanical features and porous or channeled structures have significant influence on cell adhesion, proliferation, migration, and differentiation. − Generally, physical composite techniques or 3D printing is used to prepare polymeric scaffolds with desired physicochemical features to achieve cell seeding and subsequent tissue regeneration. ,, Previously, in our group, we prepared silk fiber-based composite scaffolds by integrating natural macromolecules [gelatin, silk fibroin, and Antheraea pernyi (Ap) silk fiber] with PLLA porous microspheres (PMs) stimulated by a “steel bar reinforced concrete” structure.…”