2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.abd.2020.12.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Auricular reconstruction after Mohs micrographic surgery: analysis of 101 cases

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most common reconstructive options for partial-thickness ear defects and those less than 1.5cm are primary closure and full-thickness skin grafts. 98,99 However, there is little evidence for the optimal repair of both large partial-thickness and full-thickness defects of the ear. Level III evidence supports the use of secondary intention for helical defects between 1-3cm that minimally involve cartilage.…”
Section: Ear Defectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most common reconstructive options for partial-thickness ear defects and those less than 1.5cm are primary closure and full-thickness skin grafts. 98,99 However, there is little evidence for the optimal repair of both large partial-thickness and full-thickness defects of the ear. Level III evidence supports the use of secondary intention for helical defects between 1-3cm that minimally involve cartilage.…”
Section: Ear Defectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the abundance of literature that exists detailing ear reconstruction [ 1 , 2 , 3–19 ], no single surgical plan befits all reconstructive needs and individualized treatment plans are necessary. Single-stage auricular reconstruction can be particularly challenging due to the distinct anatomy of the ear and the need to prioritize both function and aesthetic [ 20 ]. Single-stage reconstructive sequences can be favorable in the elderly population and for those with comorbidities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%