Public reporting burden for the collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington VA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to a penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number.
SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSOR/MONITOR'S ACRONYM(S)
SPONSOR/MONITOR'S REPORT NUMBER(S)
DISTRIBUTION/AVAILABILITY STATEMENTApproved for public release; distribution unlimited
SUPPLEMENTARY NOTESThe original document contains color images.
ABSTRACTAutomated support systems may be useful tools for aiding situation assessment in complex environments such as the military battlefield, medical diagnosis, and crisis management. These environments are marked by large amounts of information which often must be weighted and integrated into a meaningful judgment or assessment. Two experiments examined the effects of attention cueing and decision aiding on information integration tasks in static battlefield situations. In the first experiment, sixteen participants completed a resource allocation task for 56 battlefield scenarios (based on perceived threats). For half the trials, an automated system guided their attention to high-relevance information. On 2 trials a memory probe was administered to assess the depth of processing of information, and on the final trial an automation failure was presented. Results demonstrated an overall allocation performance advantage for automation but poorer recall for automation-enhanced units. Half of the participants failed to attend to the system failure. Those participants who detected the failure were inferred to have processed all of the cues more deeply based on their performance on the memory trials. In the second part, 12 participants completed the same task using an automated diagnostic aid (instead of the attention cueing). Again, performance was improved when using automation, more so than in experiment 1. However, there were costs associated with the processing of highly relevant information in these conditions. The costs and benefits of automated cueing and diagnostic aiding are discussed.
ABSTRACTAutomated support systems may be useful tools for aiding situation assessment in complex environments such as the military battlefield, medical diagnosis, and crisis management. These environments are marked by large amounts of information which often must be weighted and integrated into a meaningful judgment or assessment. Two experiments e...