2013
DOI: 10.1163/22129758-12341241
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aulos and Harp: Questions of Pitch and Tonality

Abstract: This study addresses the question of pitches and pitch structures that may have been played on the excavated instruments, assessing string lengths and their implications as well as searching for a plausible effective length for the aulos including its reed, based on computer-modelling the behaviour of the oscillating air column. The results are discussed in the context of our present knowledge about pitch ranges that were typically used in ancient music.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
5
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the uncertainty on results that the player's input introduces, the described approaches should not be considered redundant. The musical reproduction needs forced musical instrument makers to follow certain construction patterns [2].…”
Section: Aulos Case Study a Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Despite the uncertainty on results that the player's input introduces, the described approaches should not be considered redundant. The musical reproduction needs forced musical instrument makers to follow certain construction patterns [2].…”
Section: Aulos Case Study a Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ENTROTUNER's task is to find the set of fundamental frequencies that minimizes the entropy of the aggregate spectrum of Aulos. Repeated patterns in construction details of the ancient musical instruments indicate that they were built to favor certain frequencies [2]. Therefore, the proposed modified set of fundamentals should not significantly variate from the initial one [24].…”
Section: B Building the Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations