2013 IEEE International Conference on Services Computing 2013
DOI: 10.1109/scc.2013.96
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Augmenting Semantics of Web Services Based on Public Open Ontology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Pay attention to the fact that a concept is regarded as appropriate for a parameter in two cases, one of which is that the concept describes the precise meaning of the parameter, the another is that the concept represents the general meaning of the parameter. Compared with our previous work [11], the accuracy decreases by 6 percent. The deeper reason is that we adopt the different version of OpenCyc, and the different measure of match degree.…”
Section: Annotation Based On Opencyccontrasting
confidence: 66%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Pay attention to the fact that a concept is regarded as appropriate for a parameter in two cases, one of which is that the concept describes the precise meaning of the parameter, the another is that the concept represents the general meaning of the parameter. Compared with our previous work [11], the accuracy decreases by 6 percent. The deeper reason is that we adopt the different version of OpenCyc, and the different measure of match degree.…”
Section: Annotation Based On Opencyccontrasting
confidence: 66%
“…First of the all process is to get the inputs and outputs of the Web Services and semantic Web Services. Then the general idea is to match inputs and outputs of the query with inputs and outputs of the service operation respectively (Lines [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19]. The match is performed on the assumption that inputs and outputs are already associated with ontology concepts.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Annotation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations