2018
DOI: 10.1609/aaai.v32i1.11923
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Augmenting End-to-End Dialogue Systems With Commonsense Knowledge

Abstract: Building dialogue systems that can converse naturally with humans is a challenging yet intriguing problem of artificial intelligence. In open-domain human-computer conversation, where the conversational agent is expected to respond to human utterances in an interesting and engaging way, commonsense knowledge has to be integrated into the model effectively. In this paper, we investigate the impact of providing commonsense knowledge about the concepts covered in the dialogue. Our model represents the first attem… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
57
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 208 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
57
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Generally, the six baseline models can be divided into breadth-centric and depth-centric models. Tri-LSTM (Young et al 2018) is a breadth-centric model that augments its dialogue inputs with wide-ranging shallow KG facts to retrieve short KG paths. The other five baselines and HiTKG are depth-centric models which focus on a small set of KG entity-relation connections and perform deep reasoning over the KG.…”
Section: Experimental Settingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Generally, the six baseline models can be divided into breadth-centric and depth-centric models. Tri-LSTM (Young et al 2018) is a breadth-centric model that augments its dialogue inputs with wide-ranging shallow KG facts to retrieve short KG paths. The other five baselines and HiTKG are depth-centric models which focus on a small set of KG entity-relation connections and perform deep reasoning over the KG.…”
Section: Experimental Settingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generating or retrieving responses according to the walking trajectory in KGs is effective in generating goal-oriented responses. The current graph walkers can generally be divided into recurrent walkers (Young et al 2018;Zhang et al 2019;Moon et al 2019;Li et al 2022) and graph attention based walkers (Jung, Son, and Lyu 2020). Recurrent walkers decode KG paths depending on a fixed-length vector, which creates a bottleneck for the performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A related line of work (Liu et al, 2018;Moon et al, 2019;Xu et al, 2020;Young et al, 2018;Zhou et al, 2018a) that seemingly overcomes the aforementioned issues is knowledge selection from existing knowledge graphs (KGs) such as 2 Another example would be discourse relations between sentences, which we do not explore here.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In reality, all such knowledge cannot be prepared in advance. A knowledge base is not only necessary for providing various services such as information search and recommendation, but also effective for non-task-oriented dialogue systems in order to prevent generic or dull responses (Xing et al, 2017;Young et al, 2018;Zhou et al, 2018;. However, it is impractical to presuppose a perfect knowledge base (West et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%