2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00405-020-06351-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Augmented reality with HoloLens in parotid surgery: how to assess and to improve accuracy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite these drawbacks, OST-based HMDs are mostly considered for surgical applications [11,12,14,19,29] for their intrinsic comfort of the full-scale resolution fruition of the real world and for the fact that they allow the safe completion of every task even if the display fails, since the direct view of reality is not compromised [22,30]. In VST, a technical issue causing the failure of the displays will cause the critical need to remove the HMD to allow the continuation of the task.…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Despite these drawbacks, OST-based HMDs are mostly considered for surgical applications [11,12,14,19,29] for their intrinsic comfort of the full-scale resolution fruition of the real world and for the fact that they allow the safe completion of every task even if the display fails, since the direct view of reality is not compromised [22,30]. In VST, a technical issue causing the failure of the displays will cause the critical need to remove the HMD to allow the continuation of the task.…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many authors report proof of concept experience in the surgical room with commercially available devices [8][9][10][11][12][13][14], underlining the enthusiasm of the surgical world in exploring the potentialities of AR HMDs but also appraising the limitation of using a device not engineered for the surgical tasks: (1) perceptual issues related to the rendering appropriate focus cues [15][16][17], (2) the absence of a framework specifically dedicated to the medical applications [18], (3) the need for a design that takes into consideration the surgeon posture to avoid neck overload [19,20] and the need of maintaining the sterility of his hands, and (4) the need for a millimetric virtual to real registration accuracy in many interventions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Manual registration, which showed a mean error of alignment of 12.4 mm, would be another option. After appropriate training or assistance by fiducial markers, the error was reduced to 10 mm [ 11 , 33 ]. Consequently, image-based registration with Vuforia, which is much more accurate, is still the method of choice for most applications [ 29 , 30 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the accuracy is user dependent and may not be sufficient for some surgical tasks. Pratt et al (2018) and Scherl et al (2020) use manual alignment to the anatomy, whereas Creighton et al ( 2020) register to fiducial markers for guidance of targets in the skull base.…”
Section: Markerless Trackingmentioning
confidence: 99%