Augmented Reality System for Ultrasound Guidance of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

Abstract

<jats:sec><jats:title>Objective</jats:title><jats:p> Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) relies on fluoroscopy and nephrotoxic contrast medium for valve deployment. We propose an alternative guidance system using augmented reality (AR) and transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) to guide TAVI deployment. The goals of this study were to determine how consistently the aortic valve annulus is defined from TEE using different aortic valve landmarks and to compare AR guidance with fluoroscopic guidance of TAVI deployment in an aortic root model. </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods</jats:title><jats:p> Magnetic tracking sensors were integrated into the TAVI catheter and TEE probe, allowing these tools to be displayed in an AR environment. Variability in identifying aortic valve commissures and cuspal nadirs was assessed using TEE aortic root images. To compare AR guidance of TAVI deployment with fluoroscopic guidance, a TAVI stent was deployed 10 times in the aortic root model using each of the two guidance systems. </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p> Commissures and nadirs were both investigated as features for defining the valve annulus in the AR guidance system. The commissures were identified more consistently than the nadirs, with intraobserver variability of 2.2 and 3.8 mm, respectively, and interobserver variability of 3.3 and 4.7 mm, respectively. The precision of TAVI deployment using fluoroscopic guidance was 3.4 mm, whereas the precision of AR guidance was 2.9 mm, and its overall accuracy was 3.4 mm. This indicates that both have similar performance. </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusions</jats:title><jats:p> Aortic valve commissures can be identified more reliably than cuspal nadirs from TEE. The AR guidance system achieved similar deployment accuracy to that of fluoroscopy while eliminating the use and consequences of nephrotoxic contrast and radiation. </jats:p></jats:sec>

Towards X‐ray free endovascular interventions – using HoloLens for on‐line holographic visualisation

“…1.1. Related work: Even though virtual reality (VR) and augmented reality (AR) in vascular surgery [4] or neurosurgery [5] has been under active research for some time, there hasso farnot been a device that is as advanced as Microsoft's recently released HoloLens. Even though it has been available commercially only for about 1 year, there are already some results where it is applied to fluorescence-based image guided surgery [6].…”

Recent Development of Augmented Reality in Surgery: A Review

“…AR has also been successfully employed during splenectomies in children [ 33 ] and urological procedures [ 86 ]. With the increasing precision of AR systems, they can be safely used even in endocrine surgeries [ 87 – 89 ], otorhinolaryngologic surgery [ 90 ], eye surgery [ 91 ], vascular surgery [ 92 , 93 ], or dental implantology too [ 60 ]; however, their exact usefulness in such surgeries is not exactly quantified owing to the complicated structures [ 61 ]. An AR system for transcatheter aortic valve implantation was designed and successfully used by Currie et al, showing comparable accuracy to traditional fluoroscopic guidance technique, hence avoiding impending complications of contrast agent administration [ 93 ].…”

Augmented reality navigation to assist retrograde peroneal access for the endovascular treatment of critical limb ischemia

“…With the advancement of medical engineering, AR has been extensively used as a navigation tool. The intraoperative AR-assisted navigation system has been applied in various surgical procedures, such as percutaneous revascularization of coronary chronic total occlusion, transcatheter aortic valve implantation, perforator flap transplantation, plastic surgery, neurosurgery, maxillofacial surgery, and hepatopancreatobiliary surgery 8, 9, 10. Its use in vascular interventions has not been described.…”