2022
DOI: 10.33423/jhetp.v22i15.5570
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Augmented Reality Learning in Mathematics Education: A Systematic Literature Review

Abstract: The main purpose of this study was to review existing studies which are related to the characteristics of AR learning by using Systematic Literature Review (SLR). The following studies identified the implementation of AR in learning mathematics education and other studies that explored the effectiveness of AR learning towards mathematics education. The review was conducted with the processes of identification, screening, eligibility, inclusion and data analysis on five search engines which were Scopus, ProQues… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our research involved a comprehensive search for papers pertinent to our study, which we accomplished using the SLR technique (Mohamed Shaffril et al, 2021;Paul et al, 2021). In recent times, several studies have sought to conduct an SLR of STEM education using the PRISMA methodology, as shown by the works of Hamzah and Hidayat (2022), Hidayat et al (2022), , Hidayat and Wardat (2023), Jabar et al (2022), Man et al (2022), Mohamed et al (2022) and Zakeri et al (2023). We were keen on ensuring transparency in our systematic reviews, and as such, we used the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our research involved a comprehensive search for papers pertinent to our study, which we accomplished using the SLR technique (Mohamed Shaffril et al, 2021;Paul et al, 2021). In recent times, several studies have sought to conduct an SLR of STEM education using the PRISMA methodology, as shown by the works of Hamzah and Hidayat (2022), Hidayat et al (2022), , Hidayat and Wardat (2023), Jabar et al (2022), Man et al (2022), Mohamed et al (2022) and Zakeri et al (2023). We were keen on ensuring transparency in our systematic reviews, and as such, we used the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are various steps to the identification process (Kundu et al, 2020). The WoS and Scopus databases' related article search functions include keywords used to pinpoint the first step (Jabar et al, 2022). Keywords such as 'ESG', 'CFP' and 'relationship' were based on prior research and thesaurus synonyms from 2000 to 2022.…”
Section: A Systematic Review Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Firstly, only empirical article data was chosen based on the sources published in both databases (Kundu et al, 2020). Book chapters, books, conference proceedings and review articles were all left out to focus only on the actual data (Jabar et al, 2022). The search was also limited to items authored and published in English to prevent challenges and misunderstandings with language translation (Sadler et al, 2022).…”
Section: A Systematic Review Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the previous reviews included 19 articles indexed in only Scopus database (Ahmad & Junaini, 2020). In another review, Jabar et al (2022) reviewed five databases and a total of 20 articles. Similarly, Korkmaz and Morali (2022) investigated 20 research articles.…”
Section: Rationale For This Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%