Augmented Reality in Otology/Neurotology: A Scoping Review with Implications for Practice and Education

Abstract

Objective To determine how augmented reality (AR) has been applied to the field of otology/neurotology, examine trends and gaps in research, and provide an assessment of the future potential of this technology within surgical practice and education. Data Sources PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library were assessed from their inceptions through October 2022. A manual bibliography search was also conducted. Review Methods A scoping review was conducted and reported according to PRISMA‐ScR guidelines. Data from studies describing the application of AR to the field of otology/neurotology were evaluated, according to a priori inclusion/exclusion criteria. Exclusion criteria included non‐English language articles, abstracts, letters/commentaries, conference papers, and review articles. Results Eighteen articles covering a diverse range of AR platforms were included. Publication dates spanned from 2007 to 2022 and the rate of publication increased over this time. Six of 18 studies were case series in human patients although the remaining were proof of concepts in cadaveric/artificial/animal models. The most common application of AR was for surgical navigation (14 of 18 studies). Computed tomography was the most common source of input data. Few studies noted potential applications to surgical training. Conclusion Interest in the application of AR to otology/neurotology is growing based on the number of recent publications that use a broad range of hardware, software, and AR platforms. Large gaps in research such as the need for submillimeter registration error must be addressed prior to adoption in the operating room and for educational purposes. Level of Evidence N/A Laryngoscope, 133:1786–1795, 2023

A Self‐Configuring Deep Learning Network for Segmentation of Temporal Bone Anatomy in Cone‐Beam CT Imaging

“…In particular, patient-specific anatomic models can now be used by robotic systems to enforce safety barriers around critical structures or by "augmented reality" systems to enhance visual information available to the surgeon. [1][2][3][4][5][6] Successful use of these innovative approaches requires precise preoperative planning to determine safe operating pathways and visualize surrounding structures. Currently, manual segmentation of relevant anatomic structures on computed tomography (CT) images is the hallmark of such planning.…”

“…The past half‐century has seen immense evolution in the landscape of temporal bone surgery as it adapts to and integrates new technological developments. In particular, patient‐specific anatomic models can now be used by robotic systems to enforce safety barriers around critical structures or by “augmented reality” systems to enhance visual information available to the surgeon 1‐6 . Successful use of these innovative approaches requires precise pre‐operative planning to determine safe operating pathways and visualize surrounding structures.…”

Does Extended Reality Simulation Improve Surgical/Procedural Learning and Patient Outcomes When Compared With Standard Training Methods?

“…[6][7][8][9][10][11][12] These publications coincide with the decreasing costs of XR devices 13 and their increasing implementation. [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22] Many XR studies focus on a subset of XR, a particular specialty, or reactions and knowledge. However, the overall impact of XR training on behavior and patient outcomes compared with standard training methods is not fully understood.…”

“…A significant body of literature describing the technological advancements exists in the use of XR for surgical or procedural training, including multiple systematic reviews 6–12 . These publications coincide with the decreasing costs of XR devices 13 and their increasing implementation 14–22 . Many XR studies focus on a subset of XR, a particular specialty, or reactions and knowledge.…”