2020
DOI: 10.1007/s41693-020-00035-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Augmented bricklaying

Abstract: Augmented bricklaying explores the manual construction of intricate brickwork through visual augmentation, and applies and validates the concept in a real-scale building project—a fair-faced brickwork facade for a winery in Greece. As shown in previous research, robotic systems have proven to be very suitable to achieve various differentiated brickwork designs with high efficiency but show certain limitations, for example, in regard to spatial freedom or the usage of mortar on site. Hence, this research aims t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
22
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In essence, AR applications utilized this capability to improve productivity and performance in assembly tasks. On the basis of these precursor research, AR has been applied in more practical situations, such as conduit construction (Chalhoub and Ayer, 2018), implementing free-form modular surface (Fazel and Izadi, 2018), manual bricklaying (Mitterberger et al, 2020), and wood frame assembly (Qin et al, 2021). These studies examined the usability of AR for various practical tasks and compared the performance with traditional 2D printed manuals, of which the findings supported the improvement of task efficiency and accuracy by AR displays.…”
Section: Ar In Construction Assemblymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In essence, AR applications utilized this capability to improve productivity and performance in assembly tasks. On the basis of these precursor research, AR has been applied in more practical situations, such as conduit construction (Chalhoub and Ayer, 2018), implementing free-form modular surface (Fazel and Izadi, 2018), manual bricklaying (Mitterberger et al, 2020), and wood frame assembly (Qin et al, 2021). These studies examined the usability of AR for various practical tasks and compared the performance with traditional 2D printed manuals, of which the findings supported the improvement of task efficiency and accuracy by AR displays.…”
Section: Ar In Construction Assemblymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meža et al (2015) applied holographic instruction to track and monitor the process of construction projects; Fazela and Izadi ( 2018) introduced an interactive tool for constructing complex modular surfaces in Mix Reality environment; Goepel (2019) tested MR with HoloLens in the assembly of non-standard prefabricated elements based on an optimized parametric structure. Mitterberger et al (2020) referred to the major deficiency derived from the previous MR-aided manual constructions is the insufficient alignment of the digital model with the physical environment. In response, they presented a customized MR system based on an object-based visualinertial tracking method in the construction of a brick envelope.…”
Section: Mr In Building Practicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the cyborg as a metaphor, human abilities have also been enhanced and extended by computational and robotic tools. People can now sense and visualize information that was previously out of human's inherent capability with the aid of external instruments, such as smart devices (e.g., smart phone 44 and smartwatch 45 ), skin-based interface, 46,47 and wearable (e.g., head-mounted displays, 48,49 backpack and portable hand-held devices 50 ). In addition, hybrid or mixed reality starts to merge physical and digital environments into one, allowing humans to have more meaningful interactions and controls over computational and robotic tools.…”
Section: Human Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%