2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2007.02.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Augmented bilateral lateral rectus recessions in basic intermittent exotropia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
43
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
(4 reference statements)
0
43
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Lee and his associates 25 have suggested increasing the amount of lateral rectus recession by 1.5-2.5 mm for each eye in patients with intermittent exotropia and they reported an increase in success rate from 43.9% to 68.2% with a drop of undercorrection from 53.7% to 30.3% in the augmented formula group. In our study, increasing the amount of recession by 1.5 mm has significantly improved the success rate similarly from 41% to 80% in patients older than 12 years old.…”
Section: Eyementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lee and his associates 25 have suggested increasing the amount of lateral rectus recession by 1.5-2.5 mm for each eye in patients with intermittent exotropia and they reported an increase in success rate from 43.9% to 68.2% with a drop of undercorrection from 53.7% to 30.3% in the augmented formula group. In our study, increasing the amount of recession by 1.5 mm has significantly improved the success rate similarly from 41% to 80% in patients older than 12 years old.…”
Section: Eyementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three studies included basic and divergence excess (simulated or true) types of X(T),2 12 15 while four studies involved basic type only,13 14 16 17 and four studies did not report on the type of X(T) examined 18–21. Only one study stated that their sample was recruited from multiple centres2; the remainder were single-centre studies.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neither of the prospective studies used matched comparison groups. The remaining seven cohort studies were retrospective in design; two used consecutive recruitment,16 19 three studies identified cases used defined inclusion criteria,12 15 18 and in two studies, details of patient recruitment was poorly described17 21 or selective 13. In at least five of the studies, there is a possibility of selection bias associated with determining which patient received which procedure, as many of the studies state that the choice of intervention was at the ophthalmologist's or parents’ discretion 2 12 13 19 21.…”
Section: Risk Of Bias In Included Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations