2015
DOI: 10.1007/s10209-015-0428-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Augmentative and alternative communication devices for aphasia: the emerging role of “smart” mobile devices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
18
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…None of the participants used any traditional AAC tool, but they all used digital screens in the same emancipatory way that AAC is meant to work. In contrast to many traditional AAC tools, the digital screens used within the group of this study (i.e., regular smartphones and tablets) were anti-stigmatising because of their similarity to the tools used by ' everyone else' (see also Moffatt, Pourshahid & Baecker 2017). These findings should be of value within fields such as universal design, because they highlight the importance of avoiding to develop excluding or stigmatising technology.…”
Section: Literacy Practices and Agencymentioning
confidence: 74%
“…None of the participants used any traditional AAC tool, but they all used digital screens in the same emancipatory way that AAC is meant to work. In contrast to many traditional AAC tools, the digital screens used within the group of this study (i.e., regular smartphones and tablets) were anti-stigmatising because of their similarity to the tools used by ' everyone else' (see also Moffatt, Pourshahid & Baecker 2017). These findings should be of value within fields such as universal design, because they highlight the importance of avoiding to develop excluding or stigmatising technology.…”
Section: Literacy Practices and Agencymentioning
confidence: 74%
“…As the use of mobile devices has gained popularity, there are applications being developed to promote learning in several areas of knowledge, such as: mobile applications to assist people with visual impairment to communicate and control an Android mobile phone via speech recognition [10]; serious game to teach first aid for individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) [11]; collaborative games, such as the ComFiM (communication through the exchange of figures for multi-touch devices), a game to generate communicative situations among children with autism in a collaborative environment [12]; alternative communication systems for web and mobile devices to support alternative communication for inclusion processes to autism [13], to cite a few.…”
Section: A Aac and Mobile Computingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, to meet minimum levels of intensity requirements for aphasia treatment and to provide equal access to rehab services, SLPs and researchers are left with options to search for new rehab service delivery approaches that should be cost-effective and easily accessible (Code & Petheram, 2011). One such method that may be a possible solution to the concerns of intensity of therapy, accessibility and limited resources is the usage of digital technology gadgets for aphasia therapy such as, computer mediated approach, in which the therapist is not physically present (Lee, Fowler, Rodney, Cherney & Small, 2010;Moffatt, Pourshahid & Baecker, 2017). Thus, aphasia therapy will not be restricted in absence of the therapist and clinical or speech lab environment, allowing patients to engage in speech therapy independently whenever and wherever they choose (Katz, 2010).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neither CMAT is being practiced in Pakistan, except very scanty research work (Shamim, Naz & Khan, 2017;Shamim, Naz & Tariq, 2017), nor any dialogue for implementing digital technology in aphasia treatment is under consideration. The implication of this study is to introduce the growing global trend of using technology in clinical practice for aphasia treatment that is changing from traditional approaches towards usage of digital technology (Hansen, Bjornsen & DeVeney, 2017;Konnerup, 2018;Kurland, Wilkins & Stokes, 2014;McCue, Fairman, & Pramuka, 2010;Moffatt et al, 2017;Peterson, 2010;Theodoros, 2012), whenever and wherever is needed.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%