This Section of Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences appears in each issue of the Journal to stress the role of the epidemiological approach to promote advances in the field of clinical psychopharmacology, with a particular attention to controversial findings. The ultimate aims are to help develop a more critical attitude towards the results of research studies published in the international literature, to promote original research projects with higher methodological standards, and to implement the most relevant results of research in every-day clinical practice. These contributions are written in house by the journal's editorial team or commissioned by the Section Editor (no more than 1000 words, short unstructured abstract, 4 key-words, one Table or In the treatment of resistant schizophrenia, a number of meta-analyses attempted to quantify the efficacy and tolerability of antipsychotic (AP) polypharmacy v. monotherapy with contradictory results. Recently, a systematic review and metaanalysis of randomised controlled trials investigated the efficacy and tolerability of AP combination v. monotherapy in schizophrenia. It included 31 studies: 21 double-blind (considered high-quality studies) and 10 open-label (considered low-quality studies). The meta-analysis showed that, overall, the combination of two APs was more effective than monotherapy in terms of symptom reduction (standardised mean difference (SMD) = −0.53, 95% confidence interval (CI) −0.87 to −0.19); however, this result was confirmed only in the subgroup of low-quality studies. Negative symptoms improved when combining a D2 antagonist with a D2 partial agonist (SMD = −0.41, 95% CI −0.79 to −0.03) both in double-blind and open-label studies. In the present commentary, the results of this systematic review are critically discussed in terms of their clinical and research implications. Key words: Antipsychotics, evidence-based psychiatry, randomised controlled trials, schizophrenia, systematic reviews.Despite some advances, the pharmacological treatment of schizophrenia continues to be a challenge (Kane & Correll, 2010), especially in poor treatment responders, who represent a difficult to treat population with low rates of recovery that have not increased over time (Jaaskelainen et al. 2013).In patients with poor response to antipsychotics (AP), current evidence-based guidelines recommend a range of different strategies, such as waiting for a delayed response, checking adherence, dose adjustment, switching to another AP. If these strategies are ineffective and at least two trials of different APs, prescribed at adequate dose and length of treatment, have failed to provide substantial benefit, patients are considered treatment-resistant (Suzuki et al. 2011(Suzuki et al. , 2012. In treatment-resistant cases, guidelines recommend clozapine and, only if this attempt has failed, the combination of clozapine with a second AP (Lehman et al. 2004; NICE, 2009). Although guidelines suggest this combination strategy in selected circumstances only, in clinical pr...