1985
DOI: 10.1016/0090-4295(85)90557-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Augmentation ileocystoplasty in neuropathic bladder

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From a symptomatic standpoint, complete urinary continence was established in the majority of our patients after augmentation enterocystoplasty (72%). Our continence results are consistent with other studies in which continence rates range between 60% and 100% 7, 9, 10, 12–18, 20, 22–24. The primary reason patients continued to be incontinent post‐augmentation was due to an incompetent sphincter.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…From a symptomatic standpoint, complete urinary continence was established in the majority of our patients after augmentation enterocystoplasty (72%). Our continence results are consistent with other studies in which continence rates range between 60% and 100% 7, 9, 10, 12–18, 20, 22–24. The primary reason patients continued to be incontinent post‐augmentation was due to an incompetent sphincter.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…18,19 Ileum is the most commonly used bowel segment for augmentation in these patients, and the overall 'good result' rate is 77% (range: 55-88%) with 10-75% of these patients needing CISC. 8,14,15,[20][21][22][23][24][25] The 'clam' procedure introduced by Mundy and Stephenson 15 has produced good results, 14,19,[26][27][28] although the long-term results and follow-up are variable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Augmentation ileocystoplasty has been used by several investigators as a last resort before urinary diversion to treat urge incontinence that was mainly secondary to an underlying neurogenic cause [ 14–20]. However, few studies have addressed the long‐term results, durability and complications in detail [ 19, 20, 27].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these procedures have their limitations, especially the need for repeated treatment [ 11, 12]. Augmentation ileocystoplasty has been used as a last resort before urinary diversion; the ‘clam’ procedure introduced by Mundy and Stephenson [ 13] has produced good results [ 14–18] although the long‐term results and follow‐up are variable. In most of these studies, the series included a significant proportion of neurogenic bladder dysfunctions, especially myelodysplasia [ 15–20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%