Augmentation genioplasty with hydroxyapatite blocks. A case report

Harada, Kiyoshi; Torikai, Katsuyukí; Funaki, Jyunzou

doi:10.1016/s0901-5027(05)80512-0

Cited by 9 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 9 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Hydroxyapatite is a synthetic bioceramic that is similar in mineral composition to human bone. 9 It can integrate with bone when it is implanted under the periosteum. 21 However, hydroxyapatite is much more expensive than a silicone implant and it is a more complicated procedure to trim and pack the groove.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…An alternative to placing a small silicone implant at the labiomental groove, the area may be packed with hydroxyapatite. Hydroxyapatite is a synthetic bioceramic that is similar in mineral composition to human bone 9 . It can integrate with bone when it is implanted under the periosteum 21 .…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…8 Several methods have been described to correct an overly deepened labiomental groove after osseous chin advancement, including: placement of hydroxyapatite, autologous fat graft, autologous bone graft, and allograft bone. [9][10][11][12] In patients with an excessively deep labiomental groove following osseous sliding genioplasty, we provide correction using a silicone prosthesis. We aimed to study the efficacy and aesthetic outcomes of this technique.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Correction of the Deepened Labiomental Groove Using Silicone Implants in Advancement Genioplasty

Hwang

Park

2021

Journal of Craniofacial Surgery

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

loss of shape during placement, a precise fit, and decreasing surgical time.However, in literature, 2-piece puzzle 3D printed implants have been used for combined orbital floor and medial wall fractures. 2,5 They do not fully use the advantages of 3D printed implants.By using a digital workflow, digital implant was created to consider the underlying structures, such as the infraorbital nerve and lacrimal systems. The 1-piece implant made in this way was a precision fit; therefore, it is possible that navigation among intraoperative anatomical landmarks may be lost.The main limitation of this procedure was the planning time and cost. The digital planning for a custom design required 1 hour, and the manufacturing process took 1 day. The 3D printed implant is more expensive than conventionally used flexible titanium plates for orbital reconstruction.In conclusion, after considering its cost, the use of 3D printed implants should be selected. However, with reconstruction difficulty, such as extensive orbital wall fractures, the 3D printed implant was useful for decreasing operative time, and can be accessed with a limited surgical approach with a precise fit. REFERENCES 1. Cho RI, Davies BW. Combined orbital floor and medial wall fractures involving the inferomedial strut: repair technique and case series using preshaped porous polyethylene/titanium implants. Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr 2013;6:161-170 2. Kim YC, Min KH, Choi JW, et al. Patient-specific puzzle implant preformed with 3D-printed rapid prototype model for combined orbital floor and medial wall fracture.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Correction of the Deepened Labiomental Groove Using Silicone Implants in Advancement Genioplasty

Hwang

Park

2021

Journal of Craniofacial Surgery

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…There are various procedures to augment the chin, such as using alloplastic implants (Friedland et al, 1976;Feuerstein, 1978;Flowers, 1991;Harada et al, 1993;Gubisch and Kotzur, 1998), chin osteotomies and grafting techniques with costal bone or nasal cartilage grafts (Hofer, 1942;Trauner and Obwegeser, 1957;Koele, 1961;Safian, 1966;Adams, 1987;Davis, 1983;Stambaugh, 1992;Allcroft et al, 1994;Bujia, 1994;Glasgold and Glasgold, 1994;Converse, 1950;Karacaoglan et al, 1998;Karras and Wolford, 1998;Choe, 2000;Mottura, 2002). The use of the nasal hump and septal cartilage has already been described by Aufricht (1934Aufricht ( , 1958.…”

Section: Objectivesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Atypical cyst formation following chin augmentation using a nasal osteocartilaginous graft

Lazar¹,

Hausen

Mischkowski³

et al. 2006

Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Die Mukozele der Kinnregion. Eine seltene Komplikation nach Genioplastik mittels osseokartilaginärem Nasenhöckertransplantat. Literaturübersicht und Fallbericht

Lazar

Hausen

Siessegger

et al. 2003

Mund Kiefer GesichtsChir

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This case presented here is-as far as we know-one of three manifestations of a respiratory implantation cyst published. Its origin is most likely based on epithelium-like cells that have been incompletely removed from the resected nasal hump. Although severe complications of this technique have rarely been described, the surgeon must be aware of possible long-term side effects and should meticulously remove adherent nasal mucosa from the graft.

show abstract

Augmentation genioplasty with hydroxyapatite blocks. A case report

Cited by 9 publications

References 9 publications

Correction of the Deepened Labiomental Groove Using Silicone Implants in Advancement Genioplasty

Correction of the Deepened Labiomental Groove Using Silicone Implants in Advancement Genioplasty

Atypical cyst formation following chin augmentation using a nasal osteocartilaginous graft

Die Mukozele der Kinnregion. Eine seltene Komplikation nach Genioplastik mittels osseokartilaginärem Nasenhöckertransplantat. Literaturübersicht und Fallbericht

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About