1995
DOI: 10.1016/0368-2048(94)02316-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Auger line shape measurements using positron annihilation induced Auger electron spectroscopy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even after 26 h (solid triangles upside down), the Auger electrons are clearly detectable, although it was expected that there should be at least one atomic layer of adsorbates on the sample surface. In addition PAES is predominantly sensitive to the topmost atomic layer [4], and hence the copper signal should have vanished.…”
Section: Study Of the Contamination Of A Copper Foil At 150 8cmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Even after 26 h (solid triangles upside down), the Auger electrons are clearly detectable, although it was expected that there should be at least one atomic layer of adsorbates on the sample surface. In addition PAES is predominantly sensitive to the topmost atomic layer [4], and hence the copper signal should have vanished.…”
Section: Study Of the Contamination Of A Copper Foil At 150 8cmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the positron current is roughly 0.4 pA the measurement time for one spectrum with sufficient statistics was chosen on the order of 10-12 h [6]. Although this measurement time is rather short compared to PAES-experiments that are based on a lab-beam and need measurement times up to several days [4,9], it is still long compared to conventional EAES where a spectrum can be obtained after a few minutes.…”
Section: Reduction Of the Measurement Time And Enhancement Of The Sigmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, PAES is much more surface sensitive than AES, since most of the implanted positrons are trapped at the surface bound states and annihilate with electrons in the topmost atomic layer [2,3].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to the traditional high energy electron-induced AES, PAES offers several advantages: (1) surface sensitivity is enhanced because positrons are trapped in an image potential on the surface prior to annihilation; (2) beam-induced damage is minimized because very low energy (~15 eV) positrons are used; and (3) background of secondary electrons is drastically reduced because the energy of the positrons is too low to excite secondary electrons. Recent applications of PAES include distinguishing the different crystallographic planes in semiconductors [68], determining Auger lineshapes [69], detecting surface impurities [70], and studying the growth dynamics of thin films [71].…”
Section: Semiconductor Industrymentioning
confidence: 99%