2001
DOI: 10.1006/nimg.2001.0782
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Auditory Triggered Mental Imagery of Shape Involves Visual Association Areas in Early Blind Humans

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
59
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 128 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
8
59
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our approach differs from previous studies investigating object processing in blind individuals, as these studies tested for activity increases associated with the active exploration of objects (through tactile or auditory input) relative to control conditions. These studies provided evidence that regions of the high-level visual cortex of congenitally/early blind individuals are activated in response to objects conveyed by sounds (De Volder et al, 2001), touch (Amedi et al, 2010), echolocation (Arnott et al, 2013), or through visual-to-auditory sensory substitution soundscapes (Amedi et al, 2007). One consistent finding from these studies was evidence for a region in lateral occipital cortex (Amedi et al, 2002(Amedi et al, , 2007(Amedi et al, , 2010) that responds significantly more strongly to exploration of objects than to exploration of textures, to hand movements, or to retrieval of object knowledge (e.g., listening to object names, as in the present study).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Our approach differs from previous studies investigating object processing in blind individuals, as these studies tested for activity increases associated with the active exploration of objects (through tactile or auditory input) relative to control conditions. These studies provided evidence that regions of the high-level visual cortex of congenitally/early blind individuals are activated in response to objects conveyed by sounds (De Volder et al, 2001), touch (Amedi et al, 2010), echolocation (Arnott et al, 2013), or through visual-to-auditory sensory substitution soundscapes (Amedi et al, 2007). One consistent finding from these studies was evidence for a region in lateral occipital cortex (Amedi et al, 2002(Amedi et al, , 2007(Amedi et al, , 2010) that responds significantly more strongly to exploration of objects than to exploration of textures, to hand movements, or to retrieval of object knowledge (e.g., listening to object names, as in the present study).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…If this is the case, it might be an example of the general principle that information is translated into the format that fits the most adept modality (Freides, 1974). In this context, it is pertinent that the LOC is active during visual imagery of object shape in sighted participants (De Volder et al, 2001). However, some have argued against visual imagery as the basis for LOC engagement during haptic shape perception, favoring instead the idea of a multisensory shape representation (Amedi et al, 2002;Amedi et al, 2001;James et al, 2002).…”
Section: Why Are Visual Cortical Areas Involved In Normal Tactile Permentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This can be viewed as a specific instantiation of a general principle that information is translated into the format appropriate for the most adept modality, as was proposed 3 decades ago (Freides, 1974). Clear activity has, in fact, been found in the left LOC during mental imagery of object shape based on prior visual exposure in sighted subjects and haptic exposure in blind subjects (De Volder et al, 2001). On the other hand, some have argued against visual imagery as the basis for visual cortical engagement (Amedi et al, 2002;Amedi et al, 2001;James et al, 2002), since auditory objects (Amedi et al, 2002) and visual imagery (Amedi et al, 2001) fail to evoke substantial activity in the LOC, as compared with haptic or visual object perception.…”
Section: Relation Of Multisensory Activity To Visual Imagerymentioning
confidence: 98%