Auditory temporal cues can modulate visual representational momentum

Teramoto, Wataru; Hidaka, Souta; Gyoba, Jiro; Suzuki, Yuka

doi:10.3758/app.72.8.2215

Cited by 7 publications

(30 citation statements)

References 19 publications

(24 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Their results also suggest that a transient auditory signal presented around the moment of visual motion offset has no influence on perceived visual offset position when another sound is presented at the onset of the motion. The findings of present study seem inconsistent with Teramoto et al’s (2010). One possible source of discrepancy between their findings and ours would be that Teramoto et al (2010) presented the auditory signals at both the onset and offset of the visual motion, whereas we presented an auditory signal only at or near the offset of the visual motion.…”

Section: Discussioncontrasting

confidence: 99%

“…The results of Teramoto et al (2010) suggest that the close association between the auditory and visual signals accomplished by onset synchrony is necessary for the presented sound to have an effect on the perceived position of a visual offset. Their results also suggest that a transient auditory signal presented around the moment of visual motion offset has no influence on perceived visual offset position when another sound is presented at the onset of the motion.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Studies of RM have also demonstrated that the final perceived position of a moving object is mislocalized in the forward direction of motion (Freyd and Finke, 1984; Hubbard and Bharucha, 1988). RM could result from the mental representation of the object’s motion persisting for a brief period after abrupt offset (Teramoto et al, 2010). …”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Recently, Teramoto et al (2010) found that the magnitude of RM is influenced by a continuous sound accompanying a moving visual object. They showed that RM is enhanced when the sound terminates after the offset of the visual object, but reduced when the sound terminates before visual offset.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…However, based on studies indicating that visual motion perception can be modulated by a transient auditory signal (Fendrich and Corballis, 2001; Heron et al, 2004; Vroomen and de Gelder, 2004), it is still possible that the visual offset position could be influenced when a transient sound is presented temporally proximal to the offset of the visual stimulus without an auditory signal having been presented at the motion onset. Additionally, in the study by Teramoto et al (2010), the authors measured RM with a probe-judgment task. However, a mouse-pointing task is typically used with continuous motion target (Hubbard, 2005).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

A Transient Auditory Signal Shifts the Perceived Offset Position of a Moving Visual Object

Chien¹,

Ono²,

Watanabe³

2013

Front. Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Information received from different sensory modalities profoundly influences human perception. For example, changes in the auditory flutter rate induce changes in the apparent flicker rate of a flashing light (Shipley, 1964). In the present study, we investigated whether auditory information would affect the perceived offset position of a moving object. In Experiment 1, a visual object moved toward the center of the computer screen and disappeared abruptly. A transient auditory signal was presented at different times relative to the moment when the object disappeared. The results showed that if the auditory signal was presented before the abrupt offset of the moving object, the perceived final position was shifted backward, implying that the perceived visual offset position was affected by the transient auditory information. In Experiment 2, we presented the transient auditory signal to either the left or the right ear. The results showed that the perceived visual offset shifted backward more strongly when the auditory signal was presented to the same side from which the moving object originated. In Experiment 3, we found that the perceived timing of the visual offset was not affected by the spatial relation between the auditory signal and the visual offset. The present results are interpreted as indicating that an auditory signal may influence the offset position of a moving object through both spatial and temporal processes.

show abstract

Section: Discussioncontrasting

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

A Transient Auditory Signal Shifts the Perceived Offset Position of a Moving Visual Object

Chien¹,

Ono²,

Watanabe³

2013

Front. Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Crossmodal Modulation of Spatial Localization by Mimetic Words

2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The present study investigated whether aurally presented mimetic words affect the judgment of the final position of a moving object. In Experiment 1, horizontal apparent motion of a visual target was presented, and an auditory mimetic word of “byun” (representing rapid forward motion), “pitari” (representing stop of motion), or “nisahi” (nonsense syllable) was presented via headphones. Observers were asked to judge which of two test stimuli was horizontally aligned with the target. The results showed that forward displacement in the “pitari” condition was significantly smaller than in the “byun” and “nisahi” conditions. However, when non-mimetic but meaningful words were presented (Experiment 2), this effect did not occur. Our findings suggest that the mimetic words, especially that meaning stop of motion, affect spatial localization by means of mental imagery regarding “stop” established by the phonological information of the word.

show abstract

Visual Mislocalization of Moving Objects in an Audiovisual Event

Kawachi

2016

PLoS ONE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The present study investigated the influence of an auditory tone on the localization of visual objects in the stream/bounce display (SBD). In this display, two identical visual objects move toward each other, overlap, and then return to their original positions. These objects can be perceived as either streaming through or bouncing off each other. In this study, the closest distance between object centers on opposing trajectories and tone presentation timing (none, 0 ms, ± 90 ms, and ± 390 ms relative to the instant for the closest distance) were manipulated. Observers were asked to judge whether the two objects overlapped with each other and whether the objects appeared to stream through, bounce off each other, or reverse their direction of motion. A tone presented at or around the instant of the objects’ closest distance biased judgments toward “non-overlapping,” and observers overestimated the physical distance between objects. A similar bias toward direction change judgments (bounce and reverse, not stream judgments) was also observed, which was always stronger than the non-overlapping bias. Thus, these two types of judgments were not always identical. Moreover, another experiment showed that it was unlikely that this observed mislocalization could be explained by other previously known mislocalization phenomena (i.e., representational momentum, the Fröhlich effect, and a turn-point shift). These findings indicate a new example of crossmodal mislocalization, which can be obtained without temporal offsets between audiovisual stimuli. The mislocalization effect is also specific to a more complex stimulus configuration of objects on opposing trajectories, with a tone that is presented simultaneously. The present study promotes an understanding of relatively complex audiovisual interactions beyond simple one-to-one audiovisual stimuli used in previous studies.

show abstract

Auditory temporal cues can modulate visual representational momentum

Cited by 7 publications

References 19 publications

A Transient Auditory Signal Shifts the Perceived Offset Position of a Moving Visual Object

A Transient Auditory Signal Shifts the Perceived Offset Position of a Moving Visual Object

Crossmodal Modulation of Spatial Localization by Mimetic Words

Visual Mislocalization of Moving Objects in an Audiovisual Event

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About