Auditory Perception of Motor Vehicle Travel Paths

Abstract

Objective These experiments address concerns that motor vehicles in electric engine mode are so quiet that they pose a risk to pedestrians, especially those with visual impairments. Background The “quiet car” issue has focused on hybrid and electric vehicles, although it also applies to internal combustion engine vehicles. Previous research has focused on detectability of vehicles, mostly in quiet settings. Instead, we focused on the functional ability to perceive vehicle motion paths. Method Participants judged whether simulated vehicles were traveling straight or turning, with emphasis on the impact of background traffic sound. Results In quiet, listeners made the straight-or-turn judgment soon enough in the vehicle’s path to be useful for deciding whether to start crossing the street. This judgment is based largely on sound level cues rather than the spatial direction of the vehicle. With even moderate background traffic sound, the ability to tell straight from turn paths is severely compromised. The signal-to-noise ratio needed for the straight-or-turn judgment is much higher than that needed to detect a vehicle. Conclusion Although a requirement for a minimum vehicle sound level might enhance detection of vehicles in quiet settings, it is unlikely that this requirement would contribute to pedestrian awareness of vehicle movements in typical traffic settings with many vehicles present. Application The findings are relevant to deliberations by government agencies and automobile manufacturers about standards for minimum automobile sounds and, more generally, for solutions to pedestrians’ needs for information about traffic, especially for pedestrians with sensory impairments.

The Sound of Temperature: What Information do Pouring Sounds Convey Concerning the Temperature of a Beverage

“…Recently, some manufacturers have even gone so far as to emphasize the distinctive sound of their car doors closing in their advertisements (e.g., see the recent campaign by VW for their Golf cars with the strapline "It sounds just like a Golf "). There is currently also a lot of interest around trying to understand the kinds of sounds that electric cars should make (e.g., Miśkiewicz and Letowski 1999;Bergeron et al 2010;Ashmead et al 2012).…”

Do our ears help us cross streets safely?

“…Combined with recent experimental data from our laboratory that listening to music via headphones may be even more dangerous to pedestrians than distraction from talking on the phone or text-messaging,2 we have accumulated data suggesting pedestrians may rely on auditory cues for safety much more than previously recognised, as well as much more than automobile drivers. This possibility is supported also by early work on the development of auditory perception in child pedestrians3 and recent data from the perception and human factors literature 4 5. Note also that the potentially-contradictory Neider et al 6 data cited by Lichenstein et al 1 should be interpreted cautiously because the virtual pedestrian environment in that study functioned without traffic sounds.…”

Auditory localisation of conventional and electric cars: Laboratory results and implications for cycling safety

“…discriminating between either a car approaching from the left and from the right (Barton et al, 2013;Barton, Ulrich & Lew, 2012;Pfeffer & Barnecutt, 1996) or a car continuing straight and turning right (e.g. Ashmead et al, 2012;Kim et al, 2012b;Wall Emerson et al, 2011). Research findings show that adult pedestrians are generally good at the auditory localisation of cars in motion (90% or more of cars were correctly localised, Ashmead et al, 2012;Barton, Ulrich & Lew, 2012;Wall Emerson et al, 2011), especially when the cars are approaching at higher speeds.…”

“…However, in some instances, the auditory perception of traffic sounds and vehicle movement may be crucial for road users, especially for pedestrians and cyclists. Auditory perception is considered especially important for gathering information about approaching traffic from areas outside one's field of view, or when visibility is obstructed (Ashmead et al, 2012;Barton, Ulrich & Lew, 2012;Mori & Mizohata, 1995).…”