2016
DOI: 10.1109/taslp.2016.2584705
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Auditory Model-Based Dynamic Compression Controlled by Subband Instantaneous Frequency and Speech Presence Probability Estimates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the same estimates could not predict performance in timereversed two-talker babble, nor subjective hearing-aid benefit (Johannesen et al, 2016;Lopez-Poveda et al, 2017). In Kortlang et al (2016), a model-based compressor, designed to restore BM I/O functions in HI listeners, performed similarly to linear gain and a solution based on National Acoustic Laboratories' nonlinear fitting procedure, version 1 (NAL-NL1) in terms of speech intelligibility in noise across several conditions, thus casting doubt on the utility of estimating the BM I/O characteristics in individual listeners. However, the BM I/O estimation and restoration in that study were based on an audiogram and categorical loudness scaling (ACALOS, Brand & Hohmann, 2002) data from Ju¨rgens et al (2011), who compared the ACALOS parameter estimates to cochlear compression estimates obtained from the TMC method.…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, the same estimates could not predict performance in timereversed two-talker babble, nor subjective hearing-aid benefit (Johannesen et al, 2016;Lopez-Poveda et al, 2017). In Kortlang et al (2016), a model-based compressor, designed to restore BM I/O functions in HI listeners, performed similarly to linear gain and a solution based on National Acoustic Laboratories' nonlinear fitting procedure, version 1 (NAL-NL1) in terms of speech intelligibility in noise across several conditions, thus casting doubt on the utility of estimating the BM I/O characteristics in individual listeners. However, the BM I/O estimation and restoration in that study were based on an audiogram and categorical loudness scaling (ACALOS, Brand & Hohmann, 2002) data from Ju¨rgens et al (2011), who compared the ACALOS parameter estimates to cochlear compression estimates obtained from the TMC method.…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Several researchers have suggested that individual estimates of cochlear compression, such as CE, are likely to improve predictions of suprathreshold performance and hearing-aid fitting procedures ( Johannesen & Lopez-Poveda, 2008 ; Mills et al., 2007 ; Mueller & Janssen, 2004 ). However, studies along these lines have reported mixed findings ( Johannesen et al., 2016 ; Kortlang et al., 2016 ; Lopez-Poveda et al., 2017 ). For instance, while behavioral CE estimates, obtained from temporal-masking curves (TMCs, Nelson et al., 2001 ), were found to be important predictors of speech intelligibility in speech-shaped noise, hearing thresholds did not predict the performance in this case.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation