2022
DOI: 10.7554/elife.74835
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Auditory mismatch responses are differentially sensitive to changes in muscarinic acetylcholine versus dopamine receptor function

Abstract: The auditory mismatch negativity (MMN) has been proposed as a biomarker of NMDA receptor (NMDAR) dysfunction in schizophrenia. Such dysfunction may be caused by aberrant interactions of different neuromodulators with NMDARs, which could explain clinical heterogeneity among patients. In two studies (N=81 each), we used a double-blind placebo-controlled between-subject design to systematically test whether auditory mismatch responses under varying levels of environmental stability are sensitive to diminishing an… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 107 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although unnoticed by participants, given that the statistical regularities changed across experimental runs, the generative model continuously required updating. As such, our results might be reflective of a volatile sensory environment and relate to previous findings which indicate that later MMRs, such as the P3, reflect belief updates about the volatility of the underlying (hidden) statistics governing sensory observations (e.g., Weber et al, 2020 ; Weber et al, 2022 ). We leave it for future research to design experiments which are better suited to evaluate these speculations more specifically and more thoroughly.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Although unnoticed by participants, given that the statistical regularities changed across experimental runs, the generative model continuously required updating. As such, our results might be reflective of a volatile sensory environment and relate to previous findings which indicate that later MMRs, such as the P3, reflect belief updates about the volatility of the underlying (hidden) statistics governing sensory observations (e.g., Weber et al, 2020 ; Weber et al, 2022 ). We leave it for future research to design experiments which are better suited to evaluate these speculations more specifically and more thoroughly.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…In the auditory domain, the much-studied auditory mismatch negativity response (MMN) is as a marker for sensory evidence accumulation. Compelling evidence has been collected suggesting a reductiwon of MMN in psychosis, 54 and that it responds to pharmacological NMDA-receptoraffine interventions (see e.g., 55 ). Also, the strikingly high confidence with which hallucination-prone individuals hold ambiguous auditory percepts is commensurate with the Bayesian Perception framework, 56 in that overly strong prior expectations can come to dominate a relatively weakened representation of sensory evidence.…”
Section: Definitions and Pathophysiologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a reduction in MMN through an antimuscarinic drug (scopolamine as compared to glycopyrrolate, a peripheral anticholinergic without effects in the CNS) has also been demonstrated in healthy individuals ( 44 ). Importantly, it was shown in a recent preregistered trial that only biperiden, a muscarinic acetylcholine receptor antagonist, but not amisulpride, a dopamine D2/D3 receptor antagonist, galantamine, an acetylcholinesterase inhibitor increasing acetylcholine levels, nor levodopa, a dopamine precursor increasing dopamine levels, changed mismatch negativity in healthy individuals ( 45 , 46 ). Taken together, these findings suggest that muscarinic deficits entail reduced mismatch negativity, possibly through dysfunctional modulation of NMDA-dependent neurotransmission ( 4 , 47 ).…”
Section: Possible Biomarkers For Muscarinic Dysfunction In Schizophreniamentioning
confidence: 99%