2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0165-1781(02)00248-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Auditory masking experiments in schizophrenia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of this study further confirm the tight relationship between sensory gating and perceptual processing and may be useful for improving animal models of schizophrenia. Impaired attentional modulation of PPI has been found in schizophrenic patients and schizotypal personality disordered subjects (Dawson et al, 1993;Hazlett et al, 2003;Hazlett et al, 2007), and schizophrenic patients are more vulnerable to both forward masking and backward masking with noise (Kallstrand et al, 2002). Thus, an important issue is whether the conditional modulation and/or perceptual modulation of PPI is useful for improving animal models for studying schizophrenia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results of this study further confirm the tight relationship between sensory gating and perceptual processing and may be useful for improving animal models of schizophrenia. Impaired attentional modulation of PPI has been found in schizophrenic patients and schizotypal personality disordered subjects (Dawson et al, 1993;Hazlett et al, 2003;Hazlett et al, 2007), and schizophrenic patients are more vulnerable to both forward masking and backward masking with noise (Kallstrand et al, 2002). Thus, an important issue is whether the conditional modulation and/or perceptual modulation of PPI is useful for improving animal models for studying schizophrenia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Li et al, 2008). Moreover, as compared with normal controls and anxiety patients, schizophrenic patients perform much worse with noise in forward-masking and backward-masking tasks (Kallstrand, Montnémery, Nielzn, & Olsson, 2002), suggesting that the perceptual salience of target signals is more vulnerable to noise masking in schizophrenics. Recognition of a target sound against a noisy background needs selective attention to the target, and, as was mentioned above, perceived spatial separation between a target sound and a masker facilitates listeners' selective attention to the target even when the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) is not substantially changed (Freyman et al, 1999;L.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…During the initial stages of training in all exercises, auditory stimuli are processed to exaggerate the rapid temporal transitions within the sound stimuli by increasing their amplitude and stretching them in time. The goal of the processing is to increase the effectiveness with which these stimuli engage and drive plastic changes in brain auditory systems in which individuals with schizophrenia exhibit relatively poor temporal responses (30). This exaggeration is gradually removed so that by the end of training, all auditory stimuli have temporal characteristics representative of real-world rapid speech.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…." Källstrand et al [17] investigated forward masking in subjects with schizophrenia versus healthy subjects by means of a rating method. Schizophrenics displayed rigidity at a certain level of the stimulus-noise configuration, indicating a deficiency in the changing of one of the midbrain's use of its detection mechanisms into another.…”
Section: Fig 1 In Herementioning
confidence: 99%