2012
DOI: 10.1007/s10548-012-0262-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Auditory Magnetic Response to Clicks in Children and Adults: Its Components, Hemispheric Lateralization and Repetition Suppression Effect

Abstract: The auditory magnetic event-related fields (ERF) qualitatively change through the child development, reflecting maturation of auditory cortical areas. Clicks presented with long inter-stimulus interval produce distinct ERF components, and may appear useful to characterize immature EFR morphology in children. The present study is aimed to investigate morphology of the auditory ERFs in school-age children, as well as lateralization and repetition suppression of ERF components evoked by the clicks. School-age chi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

7
49
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
7
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A recent study indicated that P1m is sensitive to the place-of-articulation features of speech and their co-articulatory processes (Tavabi et al, 2007). In previous MEG studies, this component has been alternatively labeled M50 (Oram Cardy et al, 2004) or P100m (Orekhova et al, 2012(Orekhova et al, , 2013. In our previous study, this component was labeled P50m (Yoshimura et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…A recent study indicated that P1m is sensitive to the place-of-articulation features of speech and their co-articulatory processes (Tavabi et al, 2007). In previous MEG studies, this component has been alternatively labeled M50 (Oram Cardy et al, 2004) or P100m (Orekhova et al, 2012(Orekhova et al, , 2013. In our previous study, this component was labeled P50m (Yoshimura et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…For example, it has been reported that in some subjects, two M50 responses are observed. For example, using source modeling to examine left and right STG activity in children aged 7- to 16-years-old, Orekhova et al (2013) observed in many subjects two components preceding the M100 response; a relatively low-amplitude response at ~65 ms (observed in ~50% of the subjects in the left-hemisphere and 75% of the subjects in the right-hemisphere) and a much more prominent later response with a M50 topography at ~100 ms. In the present study, M50 was defined as the first field reversal preceding M100 (or M200 if M100 not present).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The presence of the “P1 complex” comprising two positive waves (P50 and P100) thus distinguishes child response to the auditory clicks from the adult P50-N100 waveform. Similarly to that in P50, the strong attenuation of P100 with stimulus repetition suggests its link with arousal-like processes (Orekhova et al, 2012, 2013; Stroganova et al, 2013). The P100/P100m response to binaural or contralateral monaural S1 click is normally of higher amplitude in the right hemisphere.…”
Section: Processing Of Novelty and Change In Asd: Evidence From Auditmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…In children, the P50 (P50m in MEG) response to click is followed by another positive deflection of potential (Stroganova et al, 2013) (Figure 1) or magnetic field (Orekhova et al, 2013) (Figure 2) with latency of about 90–140 ms (P100 or P100m in MEG). The presence of the “P1 complex” comprising two positive waves (P50 and P100) thus distinguishes child response to the auditory clicks from the adult P50-N100 waveform.…”
Section: Processing Of Novelty and Change In Asd: Evidence From Auditmentioning
confidence: 99%