2014
DOI: 10.1080/23273798.2014.894642
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Auditory evoked potentials reveal early perceptual effects of distal prosody on speech segmentation

Abstract: Prosodic context several syllables prior (i.e., distal) to an ambiguous word boundary influences speech segmentation. To assess whether distal prosody influences early perceptual processing or later lexical competition, EEG was recorded while subjects listened to eight-syllable sequences with ambiguous word boundaries for the last four syllables (e.g., tie murder bee vs. timer derby). Pitch and duration of the first 5 syllables were manipulated to induce sequence segmentation with either a monosyllabic or disy… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
(97 reference statements)
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results suggested that listeners utilized the rate information to resolve this ambiguity in exactly the ways that were predicted if word recognition is sensitive to distal speech rate in timed lexical processing. These results are compatible with previous studies demonstrating the influence of distal rate on word segmentation (e.g., Breen, Dilley, McAuley, & Sanders, 2014;Brown, Dilley, & Tanenhaus, 2012) using a different experimental paradigm. Thus, the results provide further support that distal speech rate is a powerful factor in word segmentation, assisting with perception of weak syllables lacking clear amplitude envelope cues.…”
Section: Reaction Timesupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The results suggested that listeners utilized the rate information to resolve this ambiguity in exactly the ways that were predicted if word recognition is sensitive to distal speech rate in timed lexical processing. These results are compatible with previous studies demonstrating the influence of distal rate on word segmentation (e.g., Breen, Dilley, McAuley, & Sanders, 2014;Brown, Dilley, & Tanenhaus, 2012) using a different experimental paradigm. Thus, the results provide further support that distal speech rate is a powerful factor in word segmentation, assisting with perception of weak syllables lacking clear amplitude envelope cues.…”
Section: Reaction Timesupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Specifically, regular metric patterns allow listeners to make predictions about when in time upcoming information is going to occur (Huron, 2006;Fitzroy & Sanders, 2015). Moreover, adult listeners have been shown to exploit regular metric patterns as cues to speech segmentation (Mattys & Samuel, 1997), lexical organization (Breen, Dilley, McAuley, & Sanders, 2014), syntactic structure (Schmidt-Kassow & Kotz, 2009), and semantic structure (Rothermich, Schmidt-Kassow, & Kotz, 2012). One explanation for these effects, therefore, is that regular metric patterns direct listeners' temporal attention to important sentence material, thereby facilitating comprehension Pitt & Samuel, 1990;Quené & Port, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In spoken language processing, listeners have to be able to quickly access the meaning of words in a stream of speech which unfolds rapidly over time. To achieve this, it has been shown that listeners take advantage of cues that can be used to predict upcoming information, such as specific words or prosodic structures (DeLong et al, 2005 ; van Berkum et al, 2005 ; Breen et al, 2014 ; Norris et al, 2016 ). Even before hearing a complete word, listeners are thought to fully or partially pre-activate competing similar-sounding candidates that constitute candidates for whole words (e.g., Morton, 1969 ; Luce, 1986 ; McClelland and Elman, 1986 ; Marslen-Wilson, 1987 ; Norris, 1994 ; Pierrehumbert, 2003 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%