1995
DOI: 10.1097/00004691-199503000-00008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Auditory Evoked Magnetic Fields to Tones and Pseudowords in Healthy Children and Adults

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

18
92
2

Year Published

2003
2003
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 155 publications
(118 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
18
92
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous reports indicate that M100 latency is dependent on age, with longer latencies for younger children [3,10,11]. In order to remove age effects in the present analysis, M100 latency was normalized by dividing M100 latency for each tone by the latency of the 1000 Hz tone for each hemisphere, for each participant.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous reports indicate that M100 latency is dependent on age, with longer latencies for younger children [3,10,11]. In order to remove age effects in the present analysis, M100 latency was normalized by dividing M100 latency for each tone by the latency of the 1000 Hz tone for each hemisphere, for each participant.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have previously reported a dynamic range of M100 latency modulation for tones ranging from 100 to 1000 Hz of B25-30 ms in healthy adults [4,7]. Based on previous MEG investigations with children, we expect that, overall, M100 latencies will be somewhat prolonged (30-70 ms) in children compared with adults [3,10,11]. Here we evaluate whether the dynamic range of M100 latency modulation is larger in children then in adults, reflecting an overall expansion of the range commensurate with the prolonged latency found in children, or whether the absolute range is similar in children to previous reports for adults, indicating that the frequency modulation is on a similar scale to adults but shifted in time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Some authors argue that the child N250 is commensurate with the adult N100 (Korpilahti and Lang, 1994;Kurtzberg, Vaughan, Kreuzer, & Fliegler, 1995), while other authors think of it as a counterpart of the adult N2. Paetau et al (1995) noticed that an adult-like N1m response occurred in children when longer ISIs were used (1.2-2.4 s). Ceponiene, Cheour and NiHitiinen (1998) discovered two additional negative components (N160 and 460) besides the N250 in their sample of ' children when ISIs were longer than 2 s. The authors interpreted the fronto-centrally distributed Nl60 as a correlate of the adult NI.…”
Section: ! • •mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas there is general consensus on how to score ERP/ERF auditory components, the latency and morphology of auditory components across development are only recently being defined. Paetau et al (1995) discuss the changing form of electrophysiological responses to auditory stimulation (using both tones and speech elements) as a function of typical childhood and adolescence development. They noted that auditory components differ as a function of age, and observed a tendency for major ERPs (e.g., N1) to become stronger and to occur at an earlier latency with increasing age.…”
Section: Developmental Trajectory Of M100 Latencymentioning
confidence: 99%