1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0168-5597(97)00102-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Auditory event-related potentials to semantic priming during sleep

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
41
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
4
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For both S2 and PS sleep, incongruous words showed larger N400-like waves than congruous words, with latencies and topographies similar to the waking N400. (Brualla, Romero, Serrano, & Valdizán, 1998 reported a similar finding, although with delayed N400 latencies during sleep.) Pseudowords, by contrast, elicited different ERPs depending on the vigilance state: during wakefulness they exhibited larger N400s than incongruous words, whereas during S2 sleep pseudowords and incongruous words elicited similarly greater amplitude N400s relative to congruous words.…”
Section: Erps During Sleepsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…For both S2 and PS sleep, incongruous words showed larger N400-like waves than congruous words, with latencies and topographies similar to the waking N400. (Brualla, Romero, Serrano, & Valdizán, 1998 reported a similar finding, although with delayed N400 latencies during sleep.) Pseudowords, by contrast, elicited different ERPs depending on the vigilance state: during wakefulness they exhibited larger N400s than incongruous words, whereas during S2 sleep pseudowords and incongruous words elicited similarly greater amplitude N400s relative to congruous words.…”
Section: Erps During Sleepsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…It was demonstrated that meaningful stimuli, which also require less intensity to evoke an arousal from any stage of sleep (Oswald et al, 1960), produce P300 responses during REM and Stage 2 sleep (for a review, see Cote and Campbell, 1999). Such findings indicate that lack of reset in REM should at least not be absolute but related to the characteristics, significance and/or salience of stimuli (Brualla et al, 1998;Perrin et al, 1999). The elicitation of the parietal P300 response to at least the rare, intrusive or meaningful stimuli showed that REM, a period of endogenous stimulus processing related to dreaming, may involve extended processing of exogenous stimuli under specific task conditions.…”
Section: Gamma Activity In Sleepmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To these belong studies showing priming at short SOAs (Anderson & Holcomb, 1995) as well as a degree of independence of task (Besson et al, 1992;Kutas & Hillyard, 1989) and attention (Brualla et al, 1998). On the other hand, a number of other studies indicate the importance of attention (Holcomb, 1988;McCarthy & Nobre, 1993) and of having a semantically oriented task (Chwilla, Brown, & Hagoort, 1995).…”
Section: Other N400 Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%