2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2020.10.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Auditory Corticothalamic Neurons Are Recruited by Motor Preparatory Inputs

Abstract: Highlights d L6 corticothalamic neurons (L6 CTs) were isolated during active listening tasks d L6 CT activity increases prior to movements that trigger sound and reward d Motor corollary input activates L6 CTs at similar latency to FS interneurons d Rabies tracing reveals monosynaptic inputs onto L6 CTs from globus pallidus

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
58
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
7
58
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, it is clear that the inhibitory projection to the STN (and substantial pars reticulata) mediates the motor-promoting effects, and it is consistent with the established relationship between STN activity and movement suppression (Hamani et al, 2004; Aron and Poldrack, 2006; Aron et al, 2007; Eagle et al, 2008; Schmidt et al, 2013; Schweizer et al, 2014; Fife et al, 2017; Wessel and Aron, 2017). In addition to the established literature demonstrating that the GPe sends inhibitory signals to the input and output nuclei of the basal ganglia (Jessell et al, 1978; Mink, 1996; Smith et al, 1998; Kita, 2007; Hegeman et al, 2016; Adam et al, 2020), recent studies highlight the existence of cortico-pallido-cortical loops (Naito and Kita, 1994; Chen et al, 2015; Saunders et al, 2015; Schwarz et al, 2015; Ahrlund-Richter et al, 2019; Karube et al, 2019; Abecassis et al, 2020; Adkins et al, 2020; Anastasiades et al, 2020; Clayton et al, 2020; Gehrlach et al, 2020; Lee et al, 2020; Muñoz-Castañeda et al, 2020; Garcia et al, 2021). However, the precise circuitry has yet to be defined.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, it is clear that the inhibitory projection to the STN (and substantial pars reticulata) mediates the motor-promoting effects, and it is consistent with the established relationship between STN activity and movement suppression (Hamani et al, 2004; Aron and Poldrack, 2006; Aron et al, 2007; Eagle et al, 2008; Schmidt et al, 2013; Schweizer et al, 2014; Fife et al, 2017; Wessel and Aron, 2017). In addition to the established literature demonstrating that the GPe sends inhibitory signals to the input and output nuclei of the basal ganglia (Jessell et al, 1978; Mink, 1996; Smith et al, 1998; Kita, 2007; Hegeman et al, 2016; Adam et al, 2020), recent studies highlight the existence of cortico-pallido-cortical loops (Naito and Kita, 1994; Chen et al, 2015; Saunders et al, 2015; Schwarz et al, 2015; Ahrlund-Richter et al, 2019; Karube et al, 2019; Abecassis et al, 2020; Adkins et al, 2020; Anastasiades et al, 2020; Clayton et al, 2020; Gehrlach et al, 2020; Lee et al, 2020; Muñoz-Castañeda et al, 2020; Garcia et al, 2021). However, the precise circuitry has yet to be defined.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the established literature demonstrating that the GPe sends inhibitory signals to the input and output nuclei of the basal ganglia (Jessell et al, 1978;Mink, 1996;Smith et al, 1998;Kita, 2007;Hegeman et al, 2016;Adam et al, 2020), recent studies highlight the existence of cortico-pallido-cortical loops (Naito and Kita, 1994;Chen et al, 2015;Saunders et al, 2015;Schwarz et al, 2015;Ahrlund-Richter et al, 2019;Karube et al, 2019;Abecassis et al, 2020;Adkins et al, 2020;Anastasiades et al, 2020;Clayton et al, 2020;Gehrlach et al, 2020;Lee et al, 2020;Muñoz-Castañeda et al, 2020;Garcia et al, 2021). However, the precise circuitry has yet to be defined.…”
Section: Beyond Go and No-go?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, to avoid confounding stimulus-evoked and motion-related pupil dilation, stimuli that were presented within 7 s of a motion event were discarded from further analyses (see "Methods"). Note that while our piezo sensor-based motion detection picked up postural shifts and limb movements, we did not detect orofacial movements (whisking, licking, or chewing) that are also associated with PD changes 34 . Thus, it is possible that some stimulus-driven pupil responses also contain some of these motion-related PD changes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 67%