1964
DOI: 10.1080/00221309.1964.9920609
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Auditory and Visual Time Judgment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
34
0

Year Published

1968
1968
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
5
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, research using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) has revealed the engagement of modality-dependent brain networks for motor timing tasks paced using auditory or visual stimuli (Jancke, Loose, Lutz, Specht, & Shah, 2000;Penhune, Zatorre, & Evans, 1998). This research is supported by behavioral work showing that performance on timing tasks depends on the sensory modality over which temporal information is presented (Goldstone & Goldfarb, 1964;Penney, Gibbon, & Meck, 2000;Repp & Penel, 2002;Wearden, Edwards, Fakhri, & Percival, 1998). Additional task parameters that suggest the existence of multiple neural timing networks include the duration of the interval to be timed, the involvement of motor processes in performing timing, and whether discrete or rhythmic intervals are presented (see Lewis & Miall, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…For instance, research using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) has revealed the engagement of modality-dependent brain networks for motor timing tasks paced using auditory or visual stimuli (Jancke, Loose, Lutz, Specht, & Shah, 2000;Penhune, Zatorre, & Evans, 1998). This research is supported by behavioral work showing that performance on timing tasks depends on the sensory modality over which temporal information is presented (Goldstone & Goldfarb, 1964;Penney, Gibbon, & Meck, 2000;Repp & Penel, 2002;Wearden, Edwards, Fakhri, & Percival, 1998). Additional task parameters that suggest the existence of multiple neural timing networks include the duration of the interval to be timed, the involvement of motor processes in performing timing, and whether discrete or rhythmic intervals are presented (see Lewis & Miall, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Second, visual signals are usually judged to be shorter than auditory ones, even when both signals are of equivalent duration (e.g., Behar & Bevan, 1961;Goldstone & Goldfarb, 1964;Goldstone & Lhamon, 1974;Penney, Gibbon, & Meck, 2000;Wearden, Edwards, Fakhri, & Percival, 1998). Therefore, it is possible that learning did not generalize from the auditory to the visual system in the present study because AE100 and VE100 differed in perceived duration (yet the same perceived duration might be necessary for transfer).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Participants rated the apparent durations of moving shapes on a nine-point scale ranging from 1 (very short) to 9 (very long) (Goldstone & Goldfarb, 1964). For a given physical duration, distance moved and mean speed were kept constant while the rate of change in speed varied.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%