1990
DOI: 10.1016/0013-4694(90)90213-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Auditory and visual event-related perturbations in the 40 Hz auditory steady-state response

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
10
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
3
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The training effect on ASSR phase (a latency increase with respect to sound onset) was fully expressed over the initial 488 ms of the stimulus which was free of target events and persisted without diminution until stimulus offset. The latter result suggests that changes in ASSR phase resulting from auditory experience were not affected by resets of the ASSR that can be evoked when salient stimuli (for example, an unexpected change in carrier frequency or a noise burst) are delivered during auditory tasks (Rohrbaugh et al, 1990a; Ross et al, 2005; Bosnyak et al, 2007). We have not observed reset responses to target stimuli in our studies, likely because the target stimuli were close to the TH of detection and did not alter the AM rhythm or its carrier frequency.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The training effect on ASSR phase (a latency increase with respect to sound onset) was fully expressed over the initial 488 ms of the stimulus which was free of target events and persisted without diminution until stimulus offset. The latter result suggests that changes in ASSR phase resulting from auditory experience were not affected by resets of the ASSR that can be evoked when salient stimuli (for example, an unexpected change in carrier frequency or a noise burst) are delivered during auditory tasks (Rohrbaugh et al, 1990a; Ross et al, 2005; Bosnyak et al, 2007). We have not observed reset responses to target stimuli in our studies, likely because the target stimuli were close to the TH of detection and did not alter the AM rhythm or its carrier frequency.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…harmonically or spatially), it must disrupt or abolish 35 PROCESS TIMING AND TONAL HARMONY the previous cycle in order to assert its presence (e.g. Rohrbaugh, Varner, Paige, Eckardt and Ellingson, 1990;Snyder & Large, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The significance of the CERP is that they indicate that the SSR is a dynamic wave which is probably cortically influenced. (Galambos and Makieg, 1988;Rohrbaugh et al, 1990). This wave has a high signal-to-noise ratio compared with the MLR and so may be a more useful tool.…”
Section: Conscious Awareness Is Not Necessary For Information Processmentioning
confidence: 99%