2022
DOI: 10.3758/s13428-022-01839-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Auditing the research practices and statistical analyses of the group-level temporal network approach to psychological constructs: A systematic scoping review

Abstract: This is a preprint (version January 19, 2022) of a manuscript that is undergoing peer-review for publication in a scientific journal. Analysis code, data, and supplementary materials can be found in the accompanying Open Science Framework project: https://osf.io/8647n/ TEMPORAL NETWORK APPROACH: A SCOPING REVIEW 2 Author Note

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 103 publications
(139 reference statements)
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although we aimed at easing the comparison across studies (e.g., Clayton and Karazsia 2020 ; Wullenkord et al 2021 ), such a cross-sectional approach precludes any potential cause-effect relationships between our variables of interest (e.g., Maurage et al, 2013). And this is unfortunate since anxiety-related phenomena, such as the ones described here, fluctuate over time (e.g., Blanchard et al 2022 ; Heeren et al 2015 ). For instance, one may wonder about the temporal unfolding of the relation between climate anxiety’s cognitive-emotional and functional features (e.g., does the onset of functional impairments require the precedence of cognitive and emotional impairments?).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Although we aimed at easing the comparison across studies (e.g., Clayton and Karazsia 2020 ; Wullenkord et al 2021 ), such a cross-sectional approach precludes any potential cause-effect relationships between our variables of interest (e.g., Maurage et al, 2013). And this is unfortunate since anxiety-related phenomena, such as the ones described here, fluctuate over time (e.g., Blanchard et al 2022 ; Heeren et al 2015 ). For instance, one may wonder about the temporal unfolding of the relation between climate anxiety’s cognitive-emotional and functional features (e.g., does the onset of functional impairments require the precedence of cognitive and emotional impairments?).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…However, one cannot exclude the existence of other types of cyclicity (e.g., node A→node B→node C→node A; McNally, 2021). Further elucidating the potential bidirectional dependencies between variables would require the application of temporal network analyses on data arising from experience sampling methods (for a review, see Blanchard et al, 2022). Third, our participants were from European countries.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, intensive longitudinal data will enable the application of several analysis methods. One promising approach that has gained traction in the last few years is temporal network analysis (for a review, Blanchard et al, 2022). Such explorations could give us insight into how these five distinct components trigger one another within participants over time while simultaneously investigating between-subjects associations.…”
Section: An Experience Sampling Measure Of the Key Features Of Rumina...mentioning
confidence: 99%