2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2014.01.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Audit of accuracy of clinical coding in oral surgery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Some form of data entry error is likely present. Diagnostic and procedural coding errors have been well documented in other studies, and the same is likely true for hospital charge entries (28)(29)(30)(31)(32).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Some form of data entry error is likely present. Diagnostic and procedural coding errors have been well documented in other studies, and the same is likely true for hospital charge entries (28)(29)(30)(31)(32).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…In Nouraei et al [13], their ENT coding audit led to at least one change of coding in 44% of cases, and to HRG changes in 16%, with an income variance of £109.46 per patient. In Naran et al [14], their audit led to at least one change of coding in 77% patients, and to HRG code changes in 54% patients, with an estimated £114 in lost revenue per patient. In Martinou et al [15], 32% of their breast and endocrine operations were incorrectly recorded with an estimated loss of £17,000 to the Trust over the 2-month study period.…”
Section: Comparison With Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clinician factors include lack of awareness of coding issues and diagnostic uncertainty [12,14]. Clinicians have little training and minimal exposure to the complexities of coding.…”
Section: Understanding the Cause Of Coding Errorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Continuous assessment of clinical coding is required to find ways to improve its accuracy [28]. In Andrews et al [14], a study comparing the coding consistency among three professional SNOMED CT coding companies showed no significant agreement among the experts with 33% of agreement on the same concepts.…”
Section: Discussion and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%