2012
DOI: 10.2308/atax-10184
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Audit Fees and Book-Tax Differences

Abstract: We investigate whether book-tax differences are associated with higher audit fees, a proxy for auditor risk assessments and auditor effort. Our evidence suggests that there is a significantly positive relation. Further, this association is larger for firms that appear to have managed earnings (i.e., have high accruals) relative to those that are tax avoiders (i.e., have low cash effective tax rates). Our evidence is consistent with large book-tax differences representing an observable proxy for earnings manage… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
28
0
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 107 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
3
28
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Considering the recent financial scandals, a large body of literature extends this works by investigating whether the book-tax differences (BTD) provides information about managerial discretion Mills, 1998;Wilson, 2009;Tang & Firth, 2011;Hanlon, 2005). For example, a number of studies link BTD with earnings quality or earnings persistence (Hanlon, 2005;Blaylock et al, 2012), cost of capital (Dhaliwal et al, 2009;Goh et al, 2013), audit fees (Hanlon et al, 2012). Assessing the BTD is important because BTD can be used as an attribute of financial reporting quality and can contain incremental informations for investors and users of companies' financial reports.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering the recent financial scandals, a large body of literature extends this works by investigating whether the book-tax differences (BTD) provides information about managerial discretion Mills, 1998;Wilson, 2009;Tang & Firth, 2011;Hanlon, 2005). For example, a number of studies link BTD with earnings quality or earnings persistence (Hanlon, 2005;Blaylock et al, 2012), cost of capital (Dhaliwal et al, 2009;Goh et al, 2013), audit fees (Hanlon et al, 2012). Assessing the BTD is important because BTD can be used as an attribute of financial reporting quality and can contain incremental informations for investors and users of companies' financial reports.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The auditor-related perspective includes audit firm size, and audit firm tenure (Bedard & Johnstone, 2010;Ezzamel, Gwilliam, & Holland, 2002;Urhoghide & Emeni 2014). However, a different stream of studies continues to discuss other drivers of audit fees, such as earnings managements (Gul, Chen, & Tsui, 2003;Martinez, & Jesus-Moraes, 2017), tax aggressiveness (Donohoe & Knechel, 2014;Hanlon, Krishnan & Mills, 2012;Saremi, Mohammadi & Nezhad, 2016), and corporate governance mechanisms (Boo & Sharma, 2008;Boussaidi & Hamed, 2015;Urhoghide & Emeni, 2014). The main focus of this study is to determine how tax aggressiveness and corporate governance explain changes in audit fees.…”
Section: Audit Feementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following most of the conducted researches (e.g., Manzon & Plesko, 2002;Ayers et al, 2010;Frank, Lynch & Rego, 2009;Wilson, 2009;Dhaliwal, Huber, Lee, & Pincus, 2008;Desai & Dharmapala, 2006;Hanlon et al, 2005;Moore, 2012;Hanlon, Krishnan, & Mills, 2012;Tang, 2015), BTD is the spread between pretax book income and taxable income. Taxable income is estimated by the rapport between the current tax expense and the tax rate.…”
Section: Total Book-tax Differencesmentioning
confidence: 99%