2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2018.11.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Audiovisual speech perception and language acquisition in preterm infants: A longitudinal study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
24
1
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
4
24
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…From shortly after birth, infants preferentially direct their vision to social content and later maintain this preference when presented with multiple object arrays (Gliga, Elsabbagh, Andravizou, & 2019). Gaze studies in preterm infants have also shown a consistent pattern of reduced social attentional preference and learning, in both visual and auditory contexts (Frie, Padilla, Aden, Lagercrantz, & Bartocci, 2016;Gogate, 2020;Gogate, Maganti, & Perenyi, 2014;Imafuku et al, 2017;Imafuku et al, 2019;Pereira et al, 2017;Telford et al, 2016). However, the stability of these differences over time, and whether they contribute to the ontogeny of neurodevelopmental and/or cognitive impairment, is unknown.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…From shortly after birth, infants preferentially direct their vision to social content and later maintain this preference when presented with multiple object arrays (Gliga, Elsabbagh, Andravizou, & 2019). Gaze studies in preterm infants have also shown a consistent pattern of reduced social attentional preference and learning, in both visual and auditory contexts (Frie, Padilla, Aden, Lagercrantz, & Bartocci, 2016;Gogate, 2020;Gogate, Maganti, & Perenyi, 2014;Imafuku et al, 2017;Imafuku et al, 2019;Pereira et al, 2017;Telford et al, 2016). However, the stability of these differences over time, and whether they contribute to the ontogeny of neurodevelopmental and/or cognitive impairment, is unknown.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Early divergence from this trajectory has been observed in children who later receive a diagnosis of autism (Chawarska, Macari, & Shic, 2013; Jones, Carr, & Klin, 2008), leading to the suggestion that reduced fixation on social content (hereafter, reduced social attentional preference) may be an early marker of atypical social cognition (Gogate, 2020; Imafuku, Kawai, Niwa, Shinya, & Myowa, 2019). Gaze studies in preterm infants have also shown a consistent pattern of reduced social attentional preference and learning, in both visual and auditory contexts (Frie, Padilla, Aden, Lagercrantz, & Bartocci, 2016; Gogate, 2020; Gogate, Maganti, & Perenyi, 2014; Imafuku et al, 2017; Imafuku et al, 2019; Pereira et al, 2017; Telford et al, 2016). However, the stability of these differences over time, and whether they contribute to the ontogeny of neurodevelopmental and/or cognitive impairment, is unknown.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their fragile neurosensory system was likely overwhelmed by the word–object mapping context, where mothers often used synchronous naming especially to younger infants. Their delayed perception (of synchrony, Gogate et al, ; face–voice synchrony, Pickens et al, ; Imafuku et al, ) implies a missed opportunity to learn word–object relations from mothers at both visits, requiring alternate learning mechanisms (Gogate & Hollich, ). Mothers reported a receptive vocabulary in their preterm infants of 12 months (Table ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The longitudinal sample comprised 80 mothers and infants, 40 term (GA 37‐40 weeks completed) and 40 preterm (GA 31 weeks, 6 days–36 weeks, 3 days), seen at chronological age 6–9 and 12 months (see corrected ages in Table ). Even low‐risk preterm infants exhibit auditory–visual perception delays (Gogate et al, ; Imafuku et al, ; Pickens et al, ). Therefore, borderline preterm infants (GA 32–36 weeks) were selected.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation