The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2020
DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2020.00954
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Audiovestibular Quantification in Rare Third Window Disorders in Children

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The thickness of the SCC wall was measured and a thickness of 0.5 mm or less in at least two planes was regarded as a thin SCC wall or near dehiscence. 4 In addition, clinical notes were reviewed for audio-logical assessment and genetic testing. All data were anonymized.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The thickness of the SCC wall was measured and a thickness of 0.5 mm or less in at least two planes was regarded as a thin SCC wall or near dehiscence. 4 In addition, clinical notes were reviewed for audio-logical assessment and genetic testing. All data were anonymized.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…35 Additionally, the absence of a vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials response should be measured at a lower stimulus level of 75 dB nHL, to rule out third window pathology such as semi-circular canal dehiscence. 37,38 Latency has less diagnostic relevance; however, changes in latency have been described as significant in neurological cases and multiple sclerosis cases. 39…”
Section: Vestibular-evoked Myogenic Potentials Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The X-linked group cumulatively constitutes about 1–5% of non-syndromic hearing loss [ 10 ]. DFNX2 is very rare [ 11 ] and true prevalence is unknown. Given that 1 in 1100 live births will show a congenital bilateral permanent hearing loss, of which 80% are non-syndromic genetic, and X-linked recessive hearing losses account for only 5% of this non syndromic group, of which 50% is DFNX2, the rough prevalence will be 0.0018 per 1100 live births.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The conductive component has been postulated to be due to a third-window effect that essentially arises due to a direct communication between the subarachnoid space in the cranial cavity and the perilymphatic space in the inner ear due to the incomplete cochlear partition and absent modiolus at the fundus of the IAM [ 14 , 15 ]. In a series of rare third-window abnormalities in children, DFNX2 accounted for about a fifth of all rare third-window disorders [ 11 ]. Vestibular function quantified with objective vestibulometry was reported only once [ 11 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation