Audio, video, chat, email, or survey: How much does online interview mode matter?

Abstract

In the design of qualitative interview studies, researchers are faced with the challenge of choosing between many different methods of interviewing participants. This decision is particularly important when sensitive topics are involved. Even prior to the Covid-19 pandemic, considerations of cost, logistics, and participant anonymity have increasingly pushed more interviews online. While previous work has anecdotally compared the advantages of different online interview methods, no empirical evaluation has been undertaken. To fill this gap, we conducted 154 interviews with sensitive questions across seven randomly assigned conditions, exploring differences arising from the mode (video, audio, email, instant chat, survey), anonymity level, and scheduling requirements. We surveyed interviewers and interviewees after their interview for perceptions on rapport, anonymity, and honesty. In addition, we completed a mock qualitative analysis, using the resulting codes as a measure of data equivalence. We note several qualitative differences across mode related to rapport, disclosure, and anonymity. However, we found little evidence to suggest that interview data was impacted by mode for outcomes related to interview experience or data equivalence. The most substantial differences were related logistics where we found substantially lower eligibility and completion rates, and higher time and monetary costs for audio and video modes.

Dating Violence among Undergraduate Medical Students at a Public University in Mexico City: An Exploratory Study

“…A quasi-experimental study on sensitive or dissenting information using focus groups and individual interviews reported participants’ perceptions on the collection process and found they felt less rapport and personal comfort when disclosing information on medical risk during pregnancy using the focus group modality when compared with other modalities such as in-person vs. online (video, online chat-based, and online email/message board-based) [ 88 ]. Other studies found that rapport, disclosure, and anonymity were features online methods needed to address; however, data equivalence seemed to point toward other issues (lower eligibility and completion rates and higher time and monetary costs for audio and video modes) [ 89 ]. The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the need to explore alternative methods for data collection on sensitive topics.…”

“Zooming” in on positive and accurate metaperceptions in first impressions: Examining the links with social anxiety and liking in online video interactions.

“…Further, meeting new people virtually via videoconferencing has become common practice. For example, people use this medium to collaborate on projects with unacquainted colleagues or classmates (Karis et al, 2016) and to conduct job interviews (Blacksmith et al, 2016; Oates et al, 2022). Given its rise and convenience, this form of digital communication is likely to remain integrated into most people’s lives, even in the long term.…”

Strategic Innovation in Philanthropic Institutions to Reduce Poverty Due to the Impact of COVID-19

“…The Hierarchy Diagram shows the many factors resulting from the organization's innovation and philanthropic adaptation strategies. For example, the code's coding on the node (number of references) is based on the results of interviews with researchers, articles, and videos [46]. Hierarchy charts should be scaled according to the available space so that the size of the rectangles should be considered against each other, not in absolute numbers [47].…”