2019
DOI: 10.1142/s0218348x19400073
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Audio Magnetotelluric Signal-Noise Identification and Separation Based on Multifractal Spectrum and Matching Pursuit

Abstract: To avoid the blindness of the overall de-noising method and retain useful low frequency signals that are not over processed, we proposed a novel audio magnetotelluric (AMT) signal-noise identification and separation method based on multifractal spectrum and matching pursuit. We extracted two sets of multifractal spectrum characteristic from AMT time-series data to analyze the singularity. We used a support vector machine approach to learn the multifractal spectrum characteristics in a sample’s library and gene… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this research, a library of 200 data samples was used from field measurements [ 29 ]: where 50 samples were MT signals without interference collected from a remote area with no man-made activities in the Qinghai province. The rest of the contaminated data (referred to as “square wave interference, triangle wave interference, and pulse wave interference”) were collected from the ore concentration area.…”
Section: Experiments and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this research, a library of 200 data samples was used from field measurements [ 29 ]: where 50 samples were MT signals without interference collected from a remote area with no man-made activities in the Qinghai province. The rest of the contaminated data (referred to as “square wave interference, triangle wave interference, and pulse wave interference”) were collected from the ore concentration area.…”
Section: Experiments and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, using modern data processing technology to remove the strong interference existing in measured MT signals has become an important research topic in the field of electromagnetic exploration, and the improvement of MT data quality in the strong interference area will provide strong technical support for the subsequent inversion interpretation (Ren et al ., 2013; Qi et al ., 2020). A wide variety of methods have been proposed for solving this problem, such as short‐time Fourier transform (Vozoff, 1972; Kao and Rankin, 1977; Griffin and Lim, 1984), remote reference (RR) method (Goubau et al ., 1978; Gamble et al ., 1979; Clarke et al ., 1983; Kappler, 2012), robust estimation (Egbert and Booker, 1986; Larsen, 1989; Chave and Thomson, 1989, 2004; Larsen et al ., 1996; Egbert, 1997), wavelet transform (Trad and Travassos, 2000; He et al ., 2009; Carbonari et al ., 2017), Hilbert–Huang transform (HHT) and empirical mode decomposition (EMD; Chen et al ., 2012; Cai, 2014; Chen and Fomel, 2018; Liu et al ., 2019), mathematical morphological filtering (MMF; Tang et al ., 2012b), inter‐station transfer functions (Wang et al ., 2017), Self‐organizing Map (SOM) neural networks (Carbonari et al ., 2018), multifractal spectrum and matching pursuit (MP; Li et al ., 2019), Mahalanobis distance and magnetic field constraints (Platz and Weckmann, 2019), shift‐invariant sparse coding (Li et al ., 2020) etc. These methods have certain advantages and promote the development of MT signal–noise separation research to a certain extent, but there are still some shortcomings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because the angular spectrum is seriously distorted in adverse environments, the estimated DOA when using PS may have a large offset, resulting in instability. Matching pursuit (MP) [20] can be used to improve the performance of PS by calculating the maximum inner product, but the choice of matching structure and atom width needs careful consideration. On the basis of source contributions, iterative contribution removal (ICR) [15] filters out the TF bins associated with the current estimated sound source during each iteration and then reconstructs the angular spectrum from the remainder to the next source localization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e filtered GCC is termed GCCTF. In the localization and counting step, PS with the single-point amplitude is replaced by MP [8,20] with the inner product of the atom from the perspective of contribution removal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%