1967
DOI: 10.1080/10417946709371886
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Audience response to visual stimuli in oral interpretation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1977
1977
1984
1984

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 7 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The issue of audience responses generated the most studies. These studies tried to quantify audience response to a number of production elements, such as shifts in attitude (Hansen, Phillips and Arnold, 1965;Michielutte, 1969;Phillips, Hansen and Carlson, 1965), a staging technique (Dolan, 1971;Gamble, 1977;Sturges, 1975), different formats of presentation (Brooks and Wulfetange, 1964;Warland, Trauernicht and Gruner, 1967), and dramatic structure (Lazier, Zahn and Bellinghiere, 1974). Other studies using empirical or experimental methods raised questions about personality differences between effective and ineffective actors (Klinzing, 1973), correlates of aesthetic interest for secondary students (Loveland and Michielutte, 1973), and developmental differences in improvisational behavior (Lazier, Sutton-Smith and Zahn, 1971).…”
Section: Researchmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The issue of audience responses generated the most studies. These studies tried to quantify audience response to a number of production elements, such as shifts in attitude (Hansen, Phillips and Arnold, 1965;Michielutte, 1969;Phillips, Hansen and Carlson, 1965), a staging technique (Dolan, 1971;Gamble, 1977;Sturges, 1975), different formats of presentation (Brooks and Wulfetange, 1964;Warland, Trauernicht and Gruner, 1967), and dramatic structure (Lazier, Zahn and Bellinghiere, 1974). Other studies using empirical or experimental methods raised questions about personality differences between effective and ineffective actors (Klinzing, 1973), correlates of aesthetic interest for secondary students (Loveland and Michielutte, 1973), and developmental differences in improvisational behavior (Lazier, Sutton-Smith and Zahn, 1971).…”
Section: Researchmentioning
confidence: 97%