“Audience exchange”: cultivating peer-to-peer dialogue at unfamiliar arts events

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate the usefulness of the “audience exchange” approach for audience development and research, and to highlight the insights offered by peer-to-peer dialogue in understanding experiences of unfamiliar arts. Design/methodology/approach Using a case study with contemporary arts audiences, and setting this in the wider context of studies with other first-time attenders at a range of arts events, the paper explores the use of the “audience exchange” method, in which facilitated conversations after performance events allow newcomers to reflect upon and deepen their first-time encounters with live arts. Findings The study demonstrates the way in which conversations about arts events can enrich audience experience, and shows how participants use exploratory and emotional language to articulate their understanding of unfamiliar arts events. Peer-to-peer learning occurs through these conversations, in ways that could be further supported by arts organisations as a valuable tool for audience development. The audience exchange discussions also reveal the varieties of participation from “drifting” to full attention that are all part of audience engagement. Research limitations/implications This is a small-scale, qualitative study, and the method has potential to be tested in future studies with a greater variety of participants (e.g. younger or more ethnically diverse groups). Practical implications Use of the audience exchange for enriching experiences of first-time attendance could be adopted by arts organisations as a regular part of their audience engagement. Greater understanding of how new audience members draw on prior cultural experiences in finding the language to articulate their first impressions of an unfamiliar arts event could be valuable for targeted marketing and increasing accessibility. Originality/value The originality of this study lies in its elaboration of the audience exchange method, and its focus on the language and peer-to-peer learning evident in the facilitated post-performance discussions.

Does co-production build on co-creation or does co-creation result in co-producing?

“…However, as widely discussed, value can also be seen as a socio-cultural concept, as it generates the norms and conventions followed and created in social interactions (see, e.g. Pitts and Gross, 2017). (Scott, 1987;diMaggio and Powell, 1983;Kiitsak-Prikk, 2017; Jyr€ am€ a and € Ayv€ ari, 2010) Acknowledging the socio-cultural concept elaborates on the analysis framework by focusing the third essential contextual level, environment, as M€ oller and Halinen state in their conceptual article (2017; see also Colbert, 2007).…”

“…Bonet and N egrier (2018) further exemplify that technological, societal and political trends have strongly influenced our understanding of participation in the arts. The studies on the role of customers (Bonet and N egrier, 2018) or artists (Cluley, 2013) in the co-creation of value, analysed as participants or prosumers or through engagement in digital platforms (Walmsley, 2016; see also Pitts and Burland, 2013;Pitts and Gross, 2017), highlight the need to critically reflect the phenomenon and its conceptualisations from various perspectives. In addition, as Walmsley (2016) mentions, research considering the perspectives of customer relation management is scant.…”

Co-creating bodily, interactive, and reflexive knowledge through art-based research

“…Ethnoconsumerism "studies actions, thoughts, language, institutions, and their interconnections between the categories" (Venkatesh 1995, 27-8), allowing researchers to go beyond an emic perspective to develop deeper engagement. Pitts and Gross (2017) used the 'audience exchange' approach to create interactional understanding via dialogue. On a more bodily level, Bode and Chauvin (2015) have used music, Bode (2010) proposed a performance-oriented research, and Vincs (2007) engaged in dance.…”

Out of tune. How people understand social exclusion at concerts

“…For example, arts organizations have been experimenting with post-performance lectures and discussions to connect audiences and performers. These interventions are usually dominated by experts to give the audience 'expert' insights (Heim, 2012;Pitts and Gross, 2017). An unintended side-effect of this approach may be that these interventions reinforce the idea that there is such a thing as a proper mode of consumption for a specific cultural product (cf.…”