2015
DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00179
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Audience entrainment during live contemporary dance performance: physiological and cognitive measures

Abstract: Perceiving and synchronizing to a piece of dance is a remarkable skill in humans. Research in this area is very recent and has been focused mainly on entrainment produced by regular rhythms. Here, we investigated entrainment effects on spectators perceiving a non-rhythmic and extremely slow performance issued from contemporary dance. More specifically, we studied the relationship between subjective experience and entrainment produced by perceiving this type of performance. We defined two types of entrainment. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
29
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
(64 reference statements)
1
29
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We see our findings, which start from what the performers themselves thought about the improvisations, as complementing findings from studies that measure other aspects of listening experience, such as listeners' physiological responses (e.g., Bachrach et al, 2015; Fancourt and Williamon, 2016), their judgments of the expressiveness of music performances (e.g., chapters in Fabian et al, 2014), or their continuous ratings of emotions in the music (Timmers et al, 2006; Schubert, 2011). Because listeners' judgments in our study range across the kinds of topics that the performers thought worth commenting on, they give insight about listener-performer shared understanding in a broad way that we see as reflecting the broad range of potential overlap and non-overlap.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…We see our findings, which start from what the performers themselves thought about the improvisations, as complementing findings from studies that measure other aspects of listening experience, such as listeners' physiological responses (e.g., Bachrach et al, 2015; Fancourt and Williamon, 2016), their judgments of the expressiveness of music performances (e.g., chapters in Fabian et al, 2014), or their continuous ratings of emotions in the music (Timmers et al, 2006; Schubert, 2011). Because listeners' judgments in our study range across the kinds of topics that the performers thought worth commenting on, they give insight about listener-performer shared understanding in a broad way that we see as reflecting the broad range of potential overlap and non-overlap.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Few studies have attempted to induce physiological synchrony by changing how people see themselves relative to others (for an exception, see Kraus & Mendes, 2014). Most studies examine the emergence of physiological synchrony as a function of relationship type (e.g., parent-child synchrony as a function of relationship quality; Baker, et al, 2015), social experience (e.g., synchrony between audience and performers at a dance recital; Bachrach, Fontbonne, Joufflineau, & Ulloa, 2015), or some combination of relationship type and social experience (e.g., mother-infant synchrony after exposing mother to a stressor; Waters, et al, 2014). Our study is the first to demonstrate that manipulating perceptions of social identity can increase physiological synchrony between relative strangers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We expect growing insights into the subjective experience of interacting. In combination with empirical research on different aspects of interaction processes, this can lead to novel hypotheses, for example regarding intra-and interindividual coordination (Trevarthen and Aitken 2001;Laroche et al 2014;Noy et al 2015;Bachrach et al 2015;Dumas et al 2014;De Jaegher et al 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%