2007
DOI: 10.1017/s0267190508070013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Audience, Authorship, and Artifact: The Emergent Semiotics of Web 2.0

Abstract: The second-generation Web has amplified and extended new ways of online communication. Millions of people now interact through blogs, collaborate through wikis, play multiplayer games, publish podcasts and video, build relationships through social network sites, and evaluate all the above forms of communication through feedback and ranking mechanisms. This article analyzes the emergent semiotics of what has been called Web 2.0 by focusing on three critical elements of language use and communication: audience, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
91
0
6

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 149 publications
(105 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
91
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…The second-generation of Web, known as Web 2.0, has provided new ways of online communication (Warschauer & Grimes, 2007) with its exclusive tools for communication, interaction, and collaboration (Bennett et al, 2012). Web 2.0 concentrates on the extensive applications such as blogs, video sharing, social networking and podcasting to connect the users to web authoring rather than just making use of it (Anderson, 2007).…”
Section: Podcasting Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second-generation of Web, known as Web 2.0, has provided new ways of online communication (Warschauer & Grimes, 2007) with its exclusive tools for communication, interaction, and collaboration (Bennett et al, 2012). Web 2.0 concentrates on the extensive applications such as blogs, video sharing, social networking and podcasting to connect the users to web authoring rather than just making use of it (Anderson, 2007).…”
Section: Podcasting Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The next facilitating aspect of Web 2.0 in language learning is publication. It is argued that content creation and online self-publishing made easier through Web 2.0 broaden the range of possibilities for target language production (Sun, 2009;Şahin Kızıl, 2015;Warschauer & Grimes, 2007). Furthermore, the availability of audience owing to open-to-anyone nature of Web 2.0 leads language learners to be attentive in preparing and editing their linguistic production (Arslan & Şahin Kızıl, 2010).…”
Section: And Motivation (Mccarty 2009)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, annotated or hyperlinked language resources available in abundance in Web 2.0 tools are claimed to bring about effective search of input explanations, "thus increasing the possibility of input being processed and internalized" (Zeng, 2015 p.44). Overall, Web 2.0 technologies are considered to be promising in supporting and enhancing language learning practices through having revolutionary impacts on language learners (Warschauer & Grimes, 2007).…”
Section: And Motivation (Mccarty 2009)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first moment corresponds to the first generation web (Web 1.0) also called the read-only Web that spun around search engines and the connection of information (Thomas, 2008). By contrast, the second moment, marked by the development of the read/ write Web or Web 2.0, focuses on connecting people, different forms of user generated content, participation, collaboration, authorship, and interactivity (O'Reilly, 2005;Warschauer & Grimes, 2007). llws designed under the technological constraints of Web 1.0, such as the site I will describe in this study, mostly presented content with little opportunities for interaction between the owner of the site and its users, between users and content, and between users themselves.…”
Section: Language Learning Websites (Llw) In the Field Call/cmcmentioning
confidence: 99%