Audience as Journalistic Boundary Worker: The Rhetorical Use of Comments to Critique Media Practice, Assert Legitimacy and Claim Authority

Abstract

Through a textual analysis of online comments in response to live broadcast from the San Bernardino shooters' apartment, we explore the rhetorical strategies the audience used to legitimate its participation in boundary work. Our study demonstrates that audience members can operate as resourceful boundary workers with a sophisticated, multifaceted understanding of journalism that echoes scholarly and normative professional discourse. Their critique was not limited to questioning unambiguously pernicious practices, such as glorifying violence, tabloidization, pack journalism, and violating the ethical obligation of minimizing harm. Instead, they went beyond that to problematize the practice of breaking news live as underdelivering on the promise of connecting audiences to newsworthy events of social significance, promoting voyeurism, and overusing the format as an end in itself. We also demonstrate that commenters operate as competent rhetorical agents. Although they did rely on established legitimating strategies (e.g., acting as proto-professionals), they appropriated them at the level of tactical moves in distinctive new ways (e.g., by parodying, rather than authentically emulating, the journalistic style of delivering breaking news live). They also deployed novel ways of establishing their authority as boundary workers, such as rhetorical questions and direct address, often using them in conjunction with other authority-claiming moves.

Media and Mass Shootings: Field Theory in CNN News Coverage of the Columbine High School and Parkland High School Mass Shootings

“…The channel for analysis that was selected was CNN. This channel was selected because of its popularity nationally and its wide viewership (Kananovich & Perreault, 2021). According to Statista (2020), CNN averaged 744,000 viewers per day, making it the fourth most-watched channel in terms of daily viewers.…”

“…Certain norms have shifted with the development of technology (Ferrucci & Perreault, 2021), notably the emphasis on live coverage (Kananovich & Perreault, 2021Matsa, 2017. This has had implications for coverage of crisis events over time with a greater degree of misinformation tending to be shared between confirmed reports (Deavours, 2020).…”

Audience Repair as Paradigm Repair: Fixing the ‘Gamer’ in Games Journalism

“…78 Even before the advent of the internet, gaming magazine readers were already creating the building blocks for the gaming culture seen today and in that readers were conceptualized as an active audience. 79 Yet we know that despite how journalism may perceive their audience, 80 what they actually know about their audience is quite limited. 81 In other words, who gaming journalists conceive of as their audience perhaps says more about gaming journalism than about their audience.…”

Metajournalistic Discourse as a Stabilizer within the Journalistic Field: Journalistic Practice in the Covid-19 Pandemic

“…Hence, this discourse operates as a "site in which actors publicly engage in processes of establishing definitions, setting boundaries, and rendering judgments about journalism's legitimacy" (Carlson, 2016, p. 350). Metajournalistic discourse, as the field's institutional conversation, provides a mechanism for the field to diagnose problems (Johnson, Bent & Dade, 2020), assess transgressive actors (Kananovich & Perreault, 2021), and delineate the boundaries of the field . Some of this discourse is outward-facing--reflecting journalists' awareness of the interest of those outside the field--but primarily, this discourse tends to be inward-facing, aimed at discussion primarily among other journalists (Vos, 2016).…”