1994
DOI: 10.1107/s0108270193009710
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

[AuCo3Ru(C8H11P)(C18H15P)(CO)11].1/2CH2Cl2

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These features distinguish 2b from all the other known phosphine-monosubstituted RuCo 3 clusters, where Co is always the preferred coordination site, with the exception of RuCo 3 (CO) 11 (PMe 2 Ph)(μ 3 -AuPPh 3 ), in which the phosphine ligand PMe 2 Ph was established by X-ray diffraction to be bound to Ru . In this case, however, steric effects might be at work.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…These features distinguish 2b from all the other known phosphine-monosubstituted RuCo 3 clusters, where Co is always the preferred coordination site, with the exception of RuCo 3 (CO) 11 (PMe 2 Ph)(μ 3 -AuPPh 3 ), in which the phosphine ligand PMe 2 Ph was established by X-ray diffraction to be bound to Ru . In this case, however, steric effects might be at work.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…To separate the product by TLC, the original reaction mixture was first treated with [AuCl(PPh 3 )] and TlPF 6 . This transforms the anionic products into neutral ones by substituting NEt 4 + with the Au(PPh 3 ) + fragment; this fragment (isolobal with H + ) generally coordinates in a μ 3 mode to the cobalt triangle to give a triangular bipyramidal AuCo 3 Ru core (Scheme ). ,
6
…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%