TO THE EDITOR: We read the article by Zetterberg et al 1 in which the authors investigated the association between the risk of capsule complications in cataract surgery and patient demographics, ocular comorbidity and intraoperative difficulties. The study analyzed the case mix, determined the odds ratios (ORs) for capsule complications, and created the composite risk scores from adjusted ORs of preoperative and intraoperative risk factors based on the outcomes of 118 534 cataract surgeries conducted in 2016 and coded in the Swedish National Cataract Register. The authors report that patients with a low best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) had a significantly higher risk of capsular complications; the OR was 1.67 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.46e1.90) for a BCVA of <0.5, and 3.21 (95% CI, 2.66e3.87) for a BCVA of 0.1. This finding seems to be critical; in some countries, for example, in Finland (BCVA of 0.5 in the better eye, and 0.3 in the worse eye) and in Poland (BCVA of 0.6), access to treatment for cataracts covered by public funds is restricted only to patients with a low BCVA. 2 The data from the study by Zetterberg et al not only support the opinion that BCVA should not be the sole criterion when selecting patients for surgical treatment, 3 but also shows that such an approach might lead to a higher risk of complications. Moreover, these results confirm the concept that cataract surgery guidelines should not encourage postponing surgery. 2 As the authors present, risk stratification or allocation of patients with appropriate risk profiles to surgeons in training versus experienced consultants would be beneficial. We believe the findings of this study should justify adding the low BCVA criterion to current stratification methods. 4 Interestingly, there has been a dramatic shift in cataract operations from being performed in public hospitals to private settings. 1 Simultaneously, an increase in the number of high-volume cataract surgeons and overall decrease in capsule complications were observed. 1 Further analysis of the impact of clinical setting on case mix and complication rates may guide the decisions whether cataract surgeries should be referred to specialized units, such as ambulatory surgery centers. These specialized units may also better implement simple patient medical records compared to heavy programs in the full-provider units in general hospitals. 5 With that, several studies have presented advantages associated with surgeries performed in ambulatory surgery centers: better patient satisfaction, enhanced surgeon productivity, lower cost for the insurer or patient. 5