2011
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr516
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

AUC-based biomarker ensemble with an application on gene scores predicting low bone mineral density

Abstract: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(22 reference statements)
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to the discontinuity and non-convexity of empirical AUC, a widely used technique for circumventing the computational challenge is to approximate the empirical AUC with some pairwise convex surrogate loss function. [36][37][38][39][40] However, it usually necessitates pairwise comparisons between positive and negative instances, resulting in quadratic computational complexity. [41][42][43][44] To alleviate the computational burden associated with pairwise surrogate losses, several non-pairwise strongly proper losses, such as the exponential loss and squared hinge loss, have been proposed and shown to be consistent with the AUC maximization task.…”
Section: Empirical Auc and Its Surrogate Lossesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Due to the discontinuity and non-convexity of empirical AUC, a widely used technique for circumventing the computational challenge is to approximate the empirical AUC with some pairwise convex surrogate loss function. [36][37][38][39][40] However, it usually necessitates pairwise comparisons between positive and negative instances, resulting in quadratic computational complexity. [41][42][43][44] To alleviate the computational burden associated with pairwise surrogate losses, several non-pairwise strongly proper losses, such as the exponential loss and squared hinge loss, have been proposed and shown to be consistent with the AUC maximization task.…”
Section: Empirical Auc and Its Surrogate Lossesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the discontinuity and non‐convexity of empirical AUC, a widely used technique for circumventing the computational challenge is to approximate the empirical AUC with some pairwise convex surrogate loss function 36‐40 . However, it usually necessitates pairwise comparisons between positive and negative instances, resulting in quadratic computational complexity 41‐44 .…”
Section: Main Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The AUC score of 1.00 means that the method is effective to identify the protein families. In bioinformatics and medical studies, AUC score is really important [41][42][43]. If the AUC score of a classifier is greater than 70%, that classifier is considered fair [44].…”
Section: The Performance Comparison By Using the Rnnmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, positron emission tomography (PET), computed tomography (CT), Cancer Antigen 125 (CA125), and Carbohydrate Antigen 19‐9 (CA19‐9) are all used to monitor ovarian cancer recurrence after initial treatment . Several statistical methods for combining multiple biomarkers have been developed for cross sectional studies: including methods based on Fisher's linear discriminant function, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, and model‐based methods . The common conclusion from the literature is that the diagnostic performance of combined biomarkers for cross sectional studies is better than the performance of a single marker.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%