FIE '98. 28th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference. Moving From 'Teacher-Centered' to 'Learner-Centered' Education. Confere
DOI: 10.1109/fie.1998.736836
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Auburn University minority engineering program: overview, lessons learned, future challenges

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The California Minority Engineering Program (MEP) is an example of such a program [75][76]. Initiated through faculty effort at California State University, Northridge in 1973, the MEP model has been propagated for nearly thirty years, and has been successfully replicated at over 100 universities and privately sponsored programs [77][78][79][80][81][82][83][84][85][86][87]. Endorsed by NACME [88][89] as well as by private industry [90], the basic MEP paradigm incorporates the following key structural elements: G a formal orientation course for new freshmen; G clustering of underrepresented students in common sections of their classes; G a student study center; and G structured study groups.…”
Section: Intervention Programsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The California Minority Engineering Program (MEP) is an example of such a program [75][76]. Initiated through faculty effort at California State University, Northridge in 1973, the MEP model has been propagated for nearly thirty years, and has been successfully replicated at over 100 universities and privately sponsored programs [77][78][79][80][81][82][83][84][85][86][87]. Endorsed by NACME [88][89] as well as by private industry [90], the basic MEP paradigm incorporates the following key structural elements: G a formal orientation course for new freshmen; G clustering of underrepresented students in common sections of their classes; G a student study center; and G structured study groups.…”
Section: Intervention Programsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research indicates, however, that this transition may be riskier for URM students than others (Bowen & Bok, 1998; Campbell, Denes, & Morrison, 2000; Pearson & Fechter, 1994). As a result, a number of higher educational institutions have experimented with and implemented programs that are specially designed to assist with the transition from high school to college (Anderson-Rowland, Reyes, & McCartney, 1998; Butler & Hicks, 2006; Friedman, 1990; Reyes, Anderson-Rowland, & McCartney, 1998; Weatherby, Shumpert, & Fergus, 1998). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%