1984
DOI: 10.1016/0168-583x(84)90030-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Au L-shell ionization by Si and S ions: Integral and differential cross sections and alignment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The accuracy of the ion-beam energy is of the order of 0.1%%uo. This introduces an additional systematic uncertainty of the measured cross sections of less than 1% for the lowest energies studied.L3 subshell[43]. From the SCA calculations we found that pM =0.01 and p& =0.10, thus justifying Eq.…”
supporting
confidence: 56%
“…The accuracy of the ion-beam energy is of the order of 0.1%%uo. This introduces an additional systematic uncertainty of the measured cross sections of less than 1% for the lowest energies studied.L3 subshell[43]. From the SCA calculations we found that pM =0.01 and p& =0.10, thus justifying Eq.…”
supporting
confidence: 56%
“…Reference Li, C1ark, and Greenless [8] Sarkadi and Mukoyama [9] Presser, Scherer, and Stahler [10] Palinkas et al [11] Jitschin et al , [12] Papp et al [13] Berinde et al [14] Uchai et al [15] Andrews et al [16] Ito et al [17] Xiaohong et al [18] McNeir et al [19] Mehta et al [20] ACKNOWLEDGMENT The authors thank the crew of the pelletron machine for providing the various ion beams.…”
Section: -25mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In a recent work Padhi et al (1995) studied the ionization of the L subshell of Au and Bi through the impact of B ions in the energy range 0.48-0.88 MeV amu −1 . Their goal was to investigate further the anomalies which have been found in previous L-shell ionization works using heavy projectile ions (Li et al 1976, Sarkadi and Mukoyama 1980, Jitschin et al 1983a, b, 1985, Pálinkás et al 1983, Berinde et al 1984, Papp et al 1984, Dexheimer et al 1986, Kambara et al 1989, Semaniak et al 1994, Dhal et al 1995a. In these works large deviations (up to one order of magnitude in some cases) were observed between the measured cross section values (subshell cross section ratios) and the predictions of the first-order ionization theories.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%