2018
DOI: 10.1088/1757-899x/365/5/052010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Atypical structural systems for mobile communication towers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 6 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Advantages and disadvantages are received for each constructive solution on the basis of the analysis of applicability of the existing and proposed towers structural solutions and evaluation of the stress-strain state performed. According to the criterion of metal consumption, the most economical version is usually chosen while the criteria for optimising atypical towers geometry and their elements are proposed and consist in simultaneously ensuring the requirements of limiting states (Golikov et al, 2018). This paper develops a new lattice telecommunication tower that fulfils the aforementioned requirements through a structural topology optimisation (STO) process and investigate the potential of employing such process as an alternative design tool.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Advantages and disadvantages are received for each constructive solution on the basis of the analysis of applicability of the existing and proposed towers structural solutions and evaluation of the stress-strain state performed. According to the criterion of metal consumption, the most economical version is usually chosen while the criteria for optimising atypical towers geometry and their elements are proposed and consist in simultaneously ensuring the requirements of limiting states (Golikov et al, 2018). This paper develops a new lattice telecommunication tower that fulfils the aforementioned requirements through a structural topology optimisation (STO) process and investigate the potential of employing such process as an alternative design tool.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%