2021
DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2021.747273
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Atypical Neural Responses of Cognitive Flexibility in Parents of Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder

Abstract: Impaired cognitive flexibility has been repeatedly demonstrated in autism spectrum disorder (ASD). There is strong evidence for genetic involvement in ASD. First-degree relatives of individuals with ASD may show mild deficits in cognitive inflexibility. The present study investigated cognitive flexibility and its neuroelectrophysiological mechanisms in first-degree relatives of individuals with ASD to assess its potential familiality. Forty-five biological parents of individuals/children with ASD (pASD) and th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, their findings need to be interpreted cautiously and significantly to be further expanded due to the limited measures addressed. More specifically, Yu et al (2021) used only one type of task to measure cool and hot EF respectively, while Kouklari et al (2017Kouklari et al ( , 2019 addressed only two ToM tasks (1st-order false belief and mental state/emotion recognition tests) and also omitted to address the "cool" cognitive flexibility EF aspect which is considered to be central in ASD (a neurocognitive dimension related to the core ASD characteristics; Cheng et al, 2021). Thus, the present study sought to expand the hot EF-ToM relation in children and adolescents in ASD, by addressing an extensive battery to capture both domains.…”
Section: Ef and Tommentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, their findings need to be interpreted cautiously and significantly to be further expanded due to the limited measures addressed. More specifically, Yu et al (2021) used only one type of task to measure cool and hot EF respectively, while Kouklari et al (2017Kouklari et al ( , 2019 addressed only two ToM tasks (1st-order false belief and mental state/emotion recognition tests) and also omitted to address the "cool" cognitive flexibility EF aspect which is considered to be central in ASD (a neurocognitive dimension related to the core ASD characteristics; Cheng et al, 2021). Thus, the present study sought to expand the hot EF-ToM relation in children and adolescents in ASD, by addressing an extensive battery to capture both domains.…”
Section: Ef and Tommentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By toddlerhood, language scores have also shown intermediate values for unaffected siblings of ASD probands in comparison with ASD-affected siblings and controls without a family history of ASD ( Marrus et al, 2018 ). Recent behavioral data also appear promising with respect to behavioral flexibility and response inhibition ( Cheng et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Toward Alternate Models To Explain the Sex Difference In Asdmentioning
confidence: 99%